New York Metro
Manhattan-first luxury and high-production public footprint, with select broader New York luxury corridor candidates flagged when appropriate.
118 source-backed directory rows
These pages explain the category, the limits of the ranking, and the practical questions a careful buyer or seller should ask before choosing representation.
The national benchmark measures how many real estate agents and teams web-grounded AI assistants name, how often model shortlists disagree, how AI Visibility relates to public performance evidence, and how rarely answers disclose their sources.
Market pages separate proof-gated teams and individual agents, rank each category by AI Visibility, and preserve production proof, review footprint, Consumer Authority, and source links for comparison.
Manhattan-first luxury and high-production public footprint, with select broader New York luxury corridor candidates flagged when appropriate.
118 source-backed directory rows
Los Angeles County and westside luxury markets where AI visibility, media authority, and high-value representation intersect.
88 source-backed directory rows
Chicago city and close-in luxury/high-production residential markets.
125 source-backed directory rows
Dallas, Fort Worth, and high-production North Texas residential markets where public production proof, review footprint, and AI visibility help consumers compare teams and individual agents.
61 source-backed directory rows
Orlando and the surrounding Central Florida residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Atlanta and the surrounding metro residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
San Francisco, Oakland, Marin, the Peninsula, and nearby Bay Area residential markets, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Philadelphia and the surrounding Main Line, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery County residential markets, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Washington, DC, Northern Virginia, and the close-in Maryland suburbs, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
51 source-backed directory rows
Seattle, Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, and the surrounding Puget Sound residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Minneapolis, Saint Paul, and the surrounding Twin Cities residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Denver and the surrounding Front Range residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Boston and the surrounding Greater Boston residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Nashville, Franklin, Brentwood, Spring Hill, Murfreesboro, and the surrounding Middle Tennessee residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
San Diego and the surrounding coastal, central, North County, and inland residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Miami, Miami Beach, Boca Raton, Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Jupiter, Coral Springs, and the broader South Florida residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence. Category lists include only candidates that cleared the current trust gates.
50 source-backed directory rows
Las Vegas, Henderson, Summerlin, and the surrounding Southern Nevada residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
St. Louis City, St. Louis County, St. Charles County, and the surrounding metro residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Houston and the surrounding Greater Houston residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in exact-entity public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
54 source-backed directory rows
Kansas City and the surrounding Missouri and Kansas residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in exact-entity public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
AI Visibility is the Index's source-backed measure of whether a real estate agent or team has enough public proof, search reach, and market authority for modern search and AI systems to find, cite, compare, and explain.
Real estate agent AI visibility rankings compare which proven agents and teams have the clearest public evidence trail for AI-assisted search systems to find, cite, and explain.
Use this site to build a smarter interview list, not to outsource a major financial decision to a single score.
The Index is designed as a living research publication: public evidence can be refreshed as it changes, but public rankings move only after validation gates pass.
A useful agent index should make its primary question clear. The Index ranks proof-gated teams and individual agents by AI Visibility, then provides Consumer Authority, production, and review lenses for deeper comparison.
A national agent resource cannot be authoritative if it publishes a thin leaderboard. The Index builds broad evidence depth first, then publishes separate proof-gated team and individual rankings in AI Visibility order.
A team is not automatically better than an individual agent, and an individual agent is not automatically more personal than a team. The better choice depends on complexity, communication style, accountability, and the kind of support your move requires.
Real estate AI visibility is the degree to which public, source-backed information about an agent or team can be retrieved and explained by AI-assisted search systems.
AI search compresses research into short answers, comparison tables, and cited summaries. That changes which agents enter the consumer's consideration set.
Reviews, production rankings, and AI visibility each answer a different question. A consumer should understand all three before hiring representation.
A great agent can still be a poor public-data candidate. For consumers doing independent research, the evidence trail matters because it gives claims something to stand on.