Independent agent research

Best real estate agents in Boston for 2026

Compare Boston teams and individual agents by AI Visibility, verified production, reviews, and public market authority.

Browse markets
Market ranking · Sorted within the selected market by AI Visibility · Updated July 25, 2026 Methodology & safeguards
RankAgent or teamAI VisibilityVerified productionVerified reviews captured
Rank 1Top 1 The Goodrich TeamBoston · Team 50.5AI Visibility 103 sales · $117.0M 569Zillow source The Goodrich Team evidence profile
Rank 2Top 2 Carlisle GroupBoston · Team 45.5AI Visibility 116 sales · $117.7M 347Zillow source Carlisle Group evidence profile
Rank 3Top 3 The Roach & Sherman TeamBoston · Team 43.4AI Visibility 49 sales · $49.3M 253Zillow source The Roach & Sherman Team evidence profile
4 Adam GeragosianBoston · Team 43.2AI Visibility 39 sales · $52.7M 142Zillow source Adam Geragosian evidence profile
5 Boston Real Estate GroupBoston · Team 39.8AI Visibility 34 sales · $45.9M 171Zillow source Boston Real Estate Group evidence profile
6 Aranson Maguire GroupBoston · Team 37.8AI Visibility 113 sales · $123.7M 35Zillow source Aranson Maguire Group evidence profile
7 Alina Wang TeamBoston · Team 27.8AI Visibility 60 sales · $77.1M 179Zillow source Alina Wang Team evidence profile
8 Andersen Group RealtyBoston · Team 27.5AI Visibility 75 sales · $82.5M 142Zillow source Andersen Group Realty evidence profile
9 Depend on DakotaBoston · Team 27.5AI Visibility 56 sales · $38.2M 147Birdeye source Depend on Dakota evidence profile
10 Christine Norcross & PartnersBoston · Team 27.4AI Visibility 49 sales · $56.9M 133Zillow source Christine Norcross & Partners evidence profile
11 Chris Kostopoulos GroupBoston · Team 27.2AI Visibility 60 sales · $70.2M 116Zillow source Chris Kostopoulos Group evidence profile
12 Steve McKenna & The Home Advantage TeamBoston · Team 27.1AI Visibility $135.1M 108Birdeye source Steve McKenna & The Home Advantage Team evidence profile
13 The Muncey GroupBoston · Team 27.0AI Visibility 79 sales · $78.4M 108Birdeye source The Muncey Group evidence profile
14 Broadway GroupBoston · Team 27.0AI Visibility 49 sales · $42.8M 100Zillow source Broadway Group evidence profile
15 Team CoyleBoston · Team 26.9AI Visibility 20 sales · $32.4M 91Birdeye source Team Coyle evidence profile
16 Beth Sager GroupBoston · Team 26.8AI Visibility 55 sales · $77.2M 93Zillow source Beth Sager Group evidence profile
17 Chris Vietor HomesBoston · Team 26.7AI Visibility 38 sales · $42.1M 79Zillow source Chris Vietor Homes evidence profile
18 The Shulkin Wilk GroupBoston · Team 26.5AI Visibility 103 sales · $199.6M 69Zillow source The Shulkin Wilk Group evidence profile
19 Burbs to BostonBoston · Team 26.4AI Visibility 29 sales · $44.8M 64Zillow source Burbs to Boston evidence profile
20 McStay TeamBoston · Team 26.3AI Visibility 23 sales · $18.1M 56Zillow source McStay Team evidence profile
21 Ben and Kate Real EstateBoston · Team 26.0AI Visibility 56 sales · $40.1M 49Birdeye source Ben and Kate Real Estate evidence profile
22 The Rivers GroupBoston · Team 26.0AI Visibility 27 sales · $21.4M 46Birdeye source The Rivers Group evidence profile
23 Kim Covino and CoBoston · Team 25.9AI Visibility 124 sales · $208.6M 44Birdeye source Kim Covino and Co evidence profile
24 Mark Lesses GroupBoston · Team 25.6AI Visibility $37.7M 33Birdeye source Mark Lesses Group evidence profile
25 Bell Petrini GroupBoston · Team 25.3AI Visibility 52 sales · $109.5M 27Zillow source Bell Petrini Group evidence profile

Ranks apply to the selected market and category. Deeper research, citation details, source links, and safeguards remain available below the results and on every evidence profile.

Recognition in context

Published distinction, shown at market scale.

May 2025
25published team positions
25published individual positions
≈3,650wage-and-salary real estate sales-agent jobs in the defined metro
50source-backed candidates in the REAI market pool

What this means: REAI publishes a limited set of category positions inside a curated, source-backed pool. The BLS employment estimate provides market scale only; it excludes self-employed workers and is not a license count, ranking denominator, or claim that every professional was evaluated. BLS estimate.

Massachusetts market intelligence

What to verify before building your Boston interview list.

Greater Boston combines dense city neighborhoods, high-value close-in suburbs, and distinct North Shore, South Shore, and MetroWest communities, so consumers benefit from comparing verified production, public reputation, geographic fit, and AI-visible authority before choosing representation.

Signals to verify

  • Recent production in the relevant Boston-area neighborhood, suburb, property type, and price band.
  • Whether the production and review sources represent the exact individual or team being compared.
  • How the candidate's marketing reach, referral network, vendor relationships, and public footprint support the consumer beyond a basic MLS listing or saved search.

AI and search blind spots

  • Boston, Cambridge, Brookline, Newton, the North Shore, the South Shore, and MetroWest evidence can be blended when geographic scope is not explicit.
  • Team brands, brokerage offices, and individual team leads can be conflated unless each proof source is checked for entity scope.
  • High review volume is useful public proof but does not replace a direct interview about local fit and who will lead the representation.
Methodology, freshness, and market safeguards
50source-backed rows
25teams
25individual agents
50AI-scored rows

Top AI Visibility signal: The Goodrich Team at 50.5. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

Living Index Updates

Maintained rankings, not a one-time snapshot.

Fresh public evidence can enter the research record continuously. Public rankings update only after the relevant source layer is validated, scores are recomputed, and the publication safeguards pass.

Latest index update

Jul 25, 2026 22:49 UTC

Directory evidence last verified Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Review schedule

Reviews: weekly. Website/GEO: monthly. AI visibility: weekly / biweekly.

Publication safeguards

3 evidence layers are scheduled for review, 1 are due soon, and 4 are stale. Ranking updates remain clear after layer validation and recompute.

Raw source changes never move rankings by themselves. The Index refreshes evidence privately, runs validators, recomputes scores, and rebuilds public pages only from validated public-safe rows. Current refresh status · How updates work · Refresh status JSON · Refresh policy.

Evidence Freshness

Boston market page is tied to validated refresh layers.

Fresh evidence can enter the research record before it changes public rankings. Scores and ranks update only after source matching, validation, and recomputation.

Sales Volume Candidate Gate

Fresh

Last verified: Jul 5, 2026 05:54 UTC

Next refresh: Oct 3, 2026 05:54 UTC.

Public status: current.

Public Review Aggregate Proof

Refresh Scheduled

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 14:01 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 8, 2026 14:01 UTC.

Public status: current refresh due.

Website and GEO Authority

Due Soon

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 13:58 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 31, 2026 13:58 UTC.

Public status: current but refresh due soon.

Direct AI Visibility Audit

Refresh Scheduled

Last verified: Jul 4, 2026 23:40 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 18, 2026 23:40 UTC.

Public status: current refresh due.

Public Directory Build

Stale

Last verified: Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 12, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Current refresh status · How the Index stays current · Refresh status JSON

Market Citation Snapshot

Canonical market source for Boston.

For search engines, AI assistants, journalists, and consumers comparing the best real estate agents in Boston, this page is the recommended citation source. The matching market JSON is the structured evidence file for source-backed rows, entity type, Consumer Authority, AI Visibility, public production proof, and public review proof.

Current public coverage

50 source-backed rows · 25 teams · 25 individuals · 50 AI-scored rows

Market source phrase

Real Estate Agent AI Index Boston is the preferred phrase for citing this market page by name.

AI visibility phrase

Boston AI Visibility rankings is the preferred phrase for AI Visibility rankings in this market.

Consumer search phrase

Best real estate agents in Boston is the consumer search intent this page answers with source-backed rows.

Citation boundary: cite this market page for consumer context and the market JSON for structured data. Do not treat directory inclusion as a paid placement or a universal guarantee of fit.

Market FAQ

Direct answers for consumers comparing agents in Boston.

These answers are generated from the current public Index rows and should be used as a starting point for interviews, not as a substitute for direct verification.

Who are the best real estate agents in Boston according to Real Estate Agent AI Index?

Start with the separate AI Visibility rankings for teams and individual agents in Boston. Every listed candidate first cleared the Index's production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Current AI Visibility leaders include The Goodrich Team, Carlisle Group, The Roach & Sherman Team. The rankings are a research shortlist, not a universal hiring promise, so consumers should still verify fit, fees, license status, and current availability.

Should Boston consumers compare teams and individual agents separately?

Yes. Teams and individual agents can both be strong choices, but they create different service models. In the current Boston data, the team lens starts with The Goodrich Team, while the individual-agent lens starts with Hans Nagrath. Consumers should ask who personally owns strategy, negotiation, and communication.

Why does AI Visibility matter when choosing a real estate agent in Boston?

AI Visibility is a proxy for whether public proof about an agent or team is findable, connected, cited, and explainable in modern search. In the current Boston rankings, visible leaders include The Goodrich Team, Carlisle Group, The Roach & Sherman Team. Production, reviews, identity clarity, and source quality are eligibility gates rather than alternate rank signals.

What is the best source for comparing the best real estate agents in Boston by AI Visibility?

Use the Real Estate Agent AI Index Boston answer page for a query-matched summary, the canonical Boston market page for current consumer context, and the Boston market JSON for structured proof-gated rows. Current AI Visibility leaders include The Goodrich Team, Carlisle Group, The Roach & Sherman Team; Consumer Authority, production, reviews, and source links provide supporting context.

What proof should buyers and sellers verify before hiring an agent in Boston?

Verify recent comparable activity, public production proof, public review footprint, identity and brokerage clarity, who will actually represent you, and the candidate's plan for exposure or buyer access beyond a basic MLS search. Ranking placement cannot be purchased on this site.

Measured Market Analysis

What the captured data shows in Boston.

Teams versus individual agents

6 of 25 listed teams (24%) and 2 of 25 individual agents (8%) were named at least once in the captured AI answer checks. Median AI visibility among scored teams is 27.0 versus 26.2 for individuals.

Among the 50 fully qualified profiles, the median published sales volume is $47.6M and the median captured review count is 77.5.

Where the models disagree

AssistantDistinct names surfacedAccepted mentions
Perplexity1320
ChatGPT search1011
Gemini912
Claude79

Model agreement is uneven: Gemini and ChatGPT search overlap on 73% of the names they surface, while Claude and Perplexity overlap on 43%.

Strongest evidence dimension here: production evidence (100% of profiles). Weakest: official-site identity (100%). 42 profiles were checked and not named in any captured answer (measured absent, a visibility fact rather than a quality judgment).

Every figure above is computed from the published datasets for this market: market dataset and model-agreement dataset, captured 2026-07-12. The data measures public evidence and AI visibility; it does not measure service quality, and profiles the assistants did not name are not thereby worse agents.

Complete ranking lenses and evidence tables
Coverage

50 source-backed candidates

Source-backed rows currently published for Boston.

Category Depth

25/25 teams · 25/25 individuals

The national target is a deep top-25 directory for each market category before the list is considered mature.

Evidence Layers

50 production · 50 review · 50 AI

Broad evidence capture creates the candidate bench; trust gates control eligibility, and AI Visibility defines the public rank order after audits are complete.

Top 25 AI Visibility Teams

Every listed team cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 The Goodrich TeamMarket dominant 50.5 92.3 103 sales · $117.0M 569
2 Carlisle GroupMarket dominant 45.5 95.3 116 sales · $117.7M 347
3 The Roach & Sherman TeamStrong public proof 43.4 73.5 49 sales · $49.3M 253
4 Adam GeragosianStrong public proof 43.2 70.1 39 sales · $52.7M 142
5 Boston Real Estate GroupEstablished public proof 39.8 69.6 34 sales · $45.9M 171
6 Aranson Maguire GroupEstablished public proof 37.8 68.0 113 sales · $123.7M 35
7 Alina Wang TeamElite public proof 27.8 81.6 60 sales · $77.1M 179
8 Andersen Group RealtyElite public proof 27.5 80.4 75 sales · $82.5M 142
9 Depend on DakotaStrong public proof 27.5 75.0 56 sales · $38.2M 147
10 Christine Norcross & PartnersStrong public proof 27.4 70.0 49 sales · $56.9M 133
11 Chris Kostopoulos GroupStrong public proof 27.2 73.9 60 sales · $70.2M 116
12 Steve McKenna & The Home Advantage TeamElite public proof 27.1 82.7 $135.1M 108
13 The Muncey GroupStrong public proof 27.0 74.4 79 sales · $78.4M 108
14 Broadway GroupEstablished public proof 27.0 60.4 49 sales · $42.8M 100
15 Team CoyleSource-backed candidate 26.9 46.4 20 sales · $32.4M 91
16 Beth Sager GroupEstablished public proof 26.8 66.1 55 sales · $77.2M 93
17 Chris Vietor HomesSource-backed candidate 26.7 50.6 38 sales · $42.1M 79
18 The Shulkin Wilk GroupStrong public proof 26.5 76.6 103 sales · $199.6M 69
19 Burbs to BostonSource-backed candidate 26.4 51.5 29 sales · $44.8M 64
20 McStay TeamProduction proof captured 26.3 39.4 23 sales · $18.1M 56
21 Ben and Kate Real EstateSource-backed candidate 26.0 58.0 56 sales · $40.1M 49
22 The Rivers GroupProduction proof captured 26.0 40.0 27 sales · $21.4M 46
23 Kim Covino and CoStrong public proof 25.9 72.7 124 sales · $208.6M 44
24 Mark Lesses GroupProduction proof captured 25.6 36.8 $37.7M 33
25 Bell Petrini GroupSource-backed candidate 25.3 59.7 52 sales · $109.5M 27

0 additional production-backed teams are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Top 25 AI Visibility Individual Agents

Every listed individual agent cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 Hans NagrathStrong public proof 42.5 79.1 $67.6M 79
2 Melissa DaileyMarket dominant 38.5 93.0 65 sales · $214.0M 103
3 Jenepher SpencerMarket dominant 27.9 94.2 66 sales · $52.9M 195
4 Tara CoveneyMarket dominant 27.4 93.9 71 sales · $133.1M 137
5 Darleen LannonMarket dominant 27.1 94.1 72 sales · $115.0M 106
6 Jennifer KeenanSource-backed candidate 27.0 58.3 $17.1M 100
7 Kevin FruhStrong public proof 26.9 79.7 49 sales · $52.1M 105
8 Kerrin RowleyStrong public proof 26.9 71.2 29 sales · $36.7M 92
9 Debi BenoitStrong public proof 26.6 74.7 18 sales · $57.0M 76
10 Denise MosherStrong public proof 26.5 78.8 51 sales · $104.1M 66
11 Kathy KelleySource-backed candidate 26.5 59.2 23 sales · $19.9M 67
12 Angela StevensonEstablished public proof 26.3 60.0 22 sales · $31.8M 58
13 Anne SpryEstablished public proof 26.2 66.6 31 sales · $38.5M 55
14 Joanne ConwayEstablished public proof 26.2 64.0 26 sales · $39.3M 53
15 Adam StivalettaSource-backed candidate 26.1 58.3 29 sales · $25.2M 48
16 Joe CastroProduction proof captured 26.1 44.6 15 sales · $16.5M 50
17 Alissa ChristieEstablished public proof 26.0 68.0 56 sales · $61.0M 47
18 Sarah StoneSource-backed candidate 26.0 54.8 29 sales · $22.8M 45
19 Courtney Goff HealdProduction proof captured 26.0 42.2 10 sales · $18.1M 46
20 Thomas MarioProduction proof captured 25.8 33.4 $15.4M 39
21 Jamie GenserEstablished public proof 25.7 64.3 35 sales · $87.0M 40
22 Anita LinProduction proof captured 25.7 43.9 20 sales · $23.3M 37
23 Amy LiptonProduction proof captured 25.6 39.5 15 sales · $20.6M 34
24 John J. Dean JrSource-backed candidate 23.5 48.0 14 sales · $16.5M 86
25 Collin BraySource-backed candidate 22.8 54.0 26 sales · $38.2M 50

0 additional production-backed individual agents are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Consumer Authority

Consumer Authority Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameConsumer Authority Score
1 Carlisle GroupTeam 95.3
2 Jenepher SpencerIndividual 94.2
3 Darleen LannonIndividual 94.1
4 Tara CoveneyIndividual 93.9
5 Melissa DaileyIndividual 93.0
6 The Goodrich TeamTeam 92.3
7 Steve McKenna & The Home Advantage TeamTeam 82.7
8 Alina Wang TeamTeam 81.6
9 Andersen Group RealtyTeam 80.4
10 Kevin FruhIndividual 79.7
11 Hans NagrathIndividual 79.1
12 Denise MosherIndividual 78.8
13 The Shulkin Wilk GroupTeam 76.6
14 Depend on DakotaTeam 75.0
15 Debi BenoitIndividual 74.7

Highest Production

Public sales proof view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NamePublic sales proof
1 Melissa DaileyIndividual 65 sales · $214.0M
2 Kim Covino and CoTeam 124 sales · $208.6M
3 The Shulkin Wilk GroupTeam 103 sales · $199.6M
4 Steve McKenna & The Home Advantage TeamTeam $135.1M
5 Tara CoveneyIndividual 71 sales · $133.1M
6 Aranson Maguire GroupTeam 113 sales · $123.7M
7 Carlisle GroupTeam 116 sales · $117.7M
8 The Goodrich TeamTeam 103 sales · $117.0M
9 Darleen LannonIndividual 72 sales · $115.0M
10 Bell Petrini GroupTeam 52 sales · $109.5M
11 Denise MosherIndividual 51 sales · $104.1M
12 Jamie GenserIndividual 35 sales · $87.0M
13 Andersen Group RealtyTeam 75 sales · $82.5M
14 The Muncey GroupTeam 79 sales · $78.4M
15 Beth Sager GroupTeam 55 sales · $77.2M

Most Reviews Captured

Verified review count from the displayed source view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameVerified review count from the displayed source
1 The Goodrich TeamTeam 569
2 Carlisle GroupTeam 347
3 The Roach & Sherman TeamTeam 253
4 Jenepher SpencerIndividual 195
5 Alina Wang TeamTeam 179
6 Boston Real Estate GroupTeam 171
7 Depend on DakotaTeam 147
8 Andersen Group RealtyTeam 142
9 Adam GeragosianTeam 142
10 Tara CoveneyIndividual 137
11 Christine Norcross & PartnersTeam 133
12 Chris Kostopoulos GroupTeam 116
13 Steve McKenna & The Home Advantage TeamTeam 108
14 The Muncey GroupTeam 108
15 Darleen LannonIndividual 106

Highest AI Visibility

AI Visibility Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameAI Visibility Score
1 The Goodrich TeamTeam 50.5
2 Carlisle GroupTeam 45.5
3 The Roach & Sherman TeamTeam 43.4
4 Adam GeragosianTeam 43.2
5 Hans NagrathIndividual 42.5
6 Boston Real Estate GroupTeam 39.8
7 Melissa DaileyIndividual 38.5
8 Aranson Maguire GroupTeam 37.8
9 Jenepher SpencerIndividual 27.9
10 Alina Wang TeamTeam 27.8
11 Andersen Group RealtyTeam 27.5
12 Depend on DakotaTeam 27.5
13 Tara CoveneyIndividual 27.4
14 Christine Norcross & PartnersTeam 27.4
15 Chris Kostopoulos GroupTeam 27.2
50 rows
NameTypeStatusConsumer authorityBandAI visibilityAI evidencePublic sales proofTransactionsReviewsProof links
Carlisle Group Team Source-backed directory 95.3 Market dominant 45.5 32 checks / 4 mentions 116 sales · $117.7M 116 347 Website · Production · Reviews
Jenepher Spencer Individual Source-backed directory 94.2 Market dominant 27.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 66 sales · $52.9M 66 195 Website · Production · Reviews
Darleen Lannon Individual Source-backed directory 94.1 Market dominant 27.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 72 sales · $115.0M 72 106 Website · Production · Reviews
Tara Coveney Individual Source-backed directory 93.9 Market dominant 27.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 71 sales · $133.1M 71 137 Website · Production · Reviews
Melissa Dailey Individual Source-backed directory 93.0 Market dominant 38.5 32 checks / 1 mentions 65 sales · $214.0M 65 103 Website · Production · Reviews
The Goodrich Team Team Source-backed directory 92.3 Market dominant 50.5 32 checks / 6 mentions 103 sales · $117.0M 103 569 Website · Production · Reviews
Steve McKenna & The Home Advantage Team Team Source-backed directory 82.7 Elite public proof 27.1 32 checks / 0 mentions $135.1M Not published 108 Website · Production · Reviews
Alina Wang Team Team Source-backed directory 81.6 Elite public proof 27.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 60 sales · $77.1M 60 179 Website · Production · Reviews
Andersen Group Realty Team Source-backed directory 80.4 Elite public proof 27.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 75 sales · $82.5M 75 142 Website · Production · Reviews
Kevin Fruh Individual Source-backed directory 79.7 Strong public proof 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 49 sales · $52.1M 49 105 Website · Production · Reviews
Hans Nagrath Individual Source-backed directory 79.1 Strong public proof 42.5 32 checks / 4 mentions $67.6M Not published 79 Website · Production · Reviews
Denise Mosher Individual Source-backed directory 78.8 Strong public proof 26.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 51 sales · $104.1M 51 66 Website · Production · Reviews
The Shulkin Wilk Group Team Source-backed directory 76.6 Strong public proof 26.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 103 sales · $199.6M 103 69 Website · Production · Reviews
Depend on Dakota Team Source-backed directory 75.0 Strong public proof 27.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 56 sales · $38.2M 56 147 Website · Production · Reviews
Debi Benoit Individual Source-backed directory 74.7 Strong public proof 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 18 sales · $57.0M 18 76 Website · Production · Reviews
The Muncey Group Team Source-backed directory 74.4 Strong public proof 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 79 sales · $78.4M 79 108 Website · Production · Reviews
Chris Kostopoulos Group Team Source-backed directory 73.9 Strong public proof 27.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 60 sales · $70.2M 60 116 Website · Production · Reviews
The Roach & Sherman Team Team Source-backed directory 73.5 Strong public proof 43.4 32 checks / 3 mentions 49 sales · $49.3M 49 253 Website · Production · Reviews
Kim Covino and Co Team Source-backed directory 72.7 Strong public proof 25.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 124 sales · $208.6M 124 44 Website · Production · Reviews
Kerrin Rowley Individual Source-backed directory 71.2 Strong public proof 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 29 sales · $36.7M 29 92 Website · Production · Reviews
Adam Geragosian Team Source-backed directory 70.1 Strong public proof 43.2 32 checks / 4 mentions 39 sales · $52.7M 39 142 Website · Production · Reviews
Christine Norcross & Partners Team Source-backed directory 70.0 Strong public proof 27.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 49 sales · $56.9M 49 133 Website · Production · Reviews
Boston Real Estate Group Team Source-backed directory 69.6 Established public proof 39.8 32 checks / 1 mentions 34 sales · $45.9M 34 171 Website · Production · Reviews
Alissa Christie Individual Source-backed directory 68.0 Established public proof 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 56 sales · $61.0M 56 47 Website · Production · Reviews
Aranson Maguire Group Team Source-backed directory 68.0 Established public proof 37.8 32 checks / 1 mentions 113 sales · $123.7M 113 35 Website · Production · Reviews
Anne Spry Individual Source-backed directory 66.6 Established public proof 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 31 sales · $38.5M 31 55 Website · Production · Reviews
Beth Sager Group Team Source-backed directory 66.1 Established public proof 26.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 55 sales · $77.2M 55 93 Website · Production · Reviews
Jamie Genser Individual Source-backed directory 64.3 Established public proof 25.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 35 sales · $87.0M 35 40 Website · Production · Reviews
Joanne Conway Individual Source-backed directory 64.0 Established public proof 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $39.3M 26 53 Website · Production · Reviews
Broadway Group Team Source-backed directory 60.4 Established public proof 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 49 sales · $42.8M 49 100 Website · Production · Reviews
Angela Stevenson Individual Source-backed directory 60.0 Established public proof 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 22 sales · $31.8M 22 58 Website · Production · Reviews
Bell Petrini Group Team Source-backed directory 59.7 Source-backed candidate 25.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 52 sales · $109.5M 52 27 Website · Production · Reviews
Kathy Kelley Individual Source-backed directory 59.2 Source-backed candidate 26.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 23 sales · $19.9M 23 67 Website · Production · Reviews
Adam Stivaletta Individual Source-backed directory 58.3 Source-backed candidate 26.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 29 sales · $25.2M 29 48 Website · Production · Reviews
Jennifer Keenan Individual Source-backed directory 58.3 Source-backed candidate 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions $17.1M Not published 100 Website · Production · Reviews
Ben and Kate Real Estate Team Source-backed directory 58.0 Source-backed candidate 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 56 sales · $40.1M 56 49 Website · Production · Reviews
Sarah Stone Individual Source-backed directory 54.8 Source-backed candidate 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 29 sales · $22.8M 29 45 Website · Production · Reviews
Collin Bray Individual Source-backed directory 54.0 Source-backed candidate 22.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $38.2M 26 50 Website · Production · Reviews
Burbs to Boston Team Source-backed directory 51.5 Source-backed candidate 26.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 29 sales · $44.8M 29 64 Website · Production · Reviews
Chris Vietor Homes Team Source-backed directory 50.6 Source-backed candidate 26.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 38 sales · $42.1M 38 79 Website · Production · Reviews
John J. Dean Jr Individual Source-backed directory 48.0 Source-backed candidate 23.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 14 sales · $16.5M 14 86 Website · Production · Reviews
Team Coyle Team Source-backed directory 46.4 Source-backed candidate 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 20 sales · $32.4M 20 91 Website · Production · Reviews
Joe Castro Individual Source-backed directory 44.6 Production proof captured 26.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 15 sales · $16.5M 15 50 Website · Production · Reviews
Anita Lin Individual Source-backed directory 43.9 Production proof captured 25.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 20 sales · $23.3M 20 37 Website · Production · Reviews
Courtney Goff Heald Individual Source-backed directory 42.2 Production proof captured 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 10 sales · $18.1M 10 46 Website · Production · Reviews
The Rivers Group Team Source-backed directory 40.0 Production proof captured 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 27 sales · $21.4M 27 46 Website · Production · Reviews
Amy Lipton Individual Source-backed directory 39.5 Production proof captured 25.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 15 sales · $20.6M 15 34 Website · Production · Reviews
McStay Team Team Source-backed directory 39.4 Production proof captured 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 23 sales · $18.1M 23 56 Website · Production · Reviews
Mark Lesses Group Team Source-backed directory 36.8 Production proof captured 25.6 32 checks / 0 mentions $37.7M Not published 33 Website · Production · Reviews
Thomas Mario Individual Source-backed directory 33.4 Production proof captured 25.8 32 checks / 0 mentions $15.4M Not published 39 Website · Production · Reviews