Independent agent research

Best real estate agents in Las Vegas for 2026

Compare Las Vegas teams and individual agents by AI Visibility, verified production, reviews, and public market authority.

Browse markets
Market ranking · Sorted within the selected market by AI Visibility · Updated July 25, 2026 Methodology & safeguards
RankAgent or teamAI VisibilityVerified productionVerified reviews captured
Rank 1Top 1 Brenkus TeamLas Vegas · Team 48.4AI Visibility 228 sales · $104.8M 423Birdeye source Brenkus Team evidence profile
Rank 2Top 2 The Cordero GroupLas Vegas · Team 48.2AI Visibility 85 sales · $40.8M 142Zillow source The Cordero Group evidence profile
Rank 3Top 3 The Craig Tann GroupLas Vegas · Team 46.0AI Visibility 877 sales · $485.9M 1,513Zillow source The Craig Tann Group evidence profile
4 Scofield GroupLas Vegas · Team 43.0AI Visibility 479 sales · $209.7M 1,046Zillow source Scofield Group evidence profile
5 Joe Taylor GroupLas Vegas · Team 39.1AI Visibility 277 sales · $138.8M 144Zillow source Joe Taylor Group evidence profile
6 DiRaffaele GroupLas Vegas · Team 39.0AI Visibility 59 sales · $37.7M 103Zillow source DiRaffaele Group evidence profile
7 Nevada Real Estate Group (NREG)Las Vegas · Team 30.0AI Visibility 789 sales · $361.6M 3,407FastExpert source Nevada Real Estate Group (NREG) evidence profile
8 Batchelor Hanna GroupLas Vegas · Team 29.4AI Visibility 250 sales · $150.0M 631Zillow source Batchelor Hanna Group evidence profile
9 The Jack Greenberg GroupLas Vegas · Team 29.2AI Visibility 221 sales · $102.3M 550Zillow source The Jack Greenberg Group evidence profile
10 Matt Suiter GroupLas Vegas · Team 28.5AI Visibility 75 sales · $31.7M 308Zillow source Matt Suiter Group evidence profile
11 The Rexford GroupLas Vegas · Team 28.4AI Visibility 131 sales · $69.7M 303Zillow source The Rexford Group evidence profile
12 Avi Dan-Goor TeamLas Vegas · Team 28.1AI Visibility 33 sales · $34.5M 238Zillow source Avi Dan-Goor Team evidence profile
13 Alt GroupLas Vegas · Team 28.1AI Visibility 69 sales · $34.1M 222Zillow source Alt Group evidence profile
14 The Napoli GroupLas Vegas · Team 28.0AI Visibility 104 sales · $179.8M 215Zillow source The Napoli Group evidence profile
15 The Real Estate GuyLas Vegas · Team 27.9AI Visibility 157 sales · $74.0M 222Zillow source The Real Estate Guy evidence profile
16 The Mumm GroupLas Vegas · Team 27.6AI Visibility 150 sales · $78.2M 161Zillow source The Mumm Group evidence profile
17 The Brooks TeamLas Vegas · Team 27.4AI Visibility 82 sales · $38.3M 137Zillow source The Brooks Team evidence profile
18 Conforte & Olson Luxury Real Estate TeamLas Vegas · Team 27.2AI Visibility 76 sales · $82.1M 113Zillow source Conforte & Olson Luxury Real Estate Team evidence profile
19 The Debartoli Real Estate GroupLas Vegas · Team 26.8AI Visibility 103 sales · $66.0M 87Zillow source The Debartoli Real Estate Group evidence profile
20 The Rivlin GroupLas Vegas · Team 26.4AI Visibility 84 sales · $40.3M 61Zillow source The Rivlin Group evidence profile
21 The Thomas GroupLas Vegas · Team 26.3AI Visibility 52 sales · $29.9M 58trustindex.io source The Thomas Group evidence profile
22 The Pohl GroupLas Vegas · Team 26.2AI Visibility 38 sales · $33.0M 53Zillow source The Pohl Group evidence profile
23 Nora Aguirre TeamLas Vegas · Team 25.9AI Visibility 148 sales · $57.0M 42Zillow source Nora Aguirre Team evidence profile
24 Brian Burrows GroupLas Vegas · Team 25.6AI Visibility 57 sales · $29.1M 34Zillow source Brian Burrows Group evidence profile
25 Lindstrom Radcliffe GroupLas Vegas · Team 25.5AI Visibility $30.5M 30Birdeye source Lindstrom Radcliffe Group evidence profile

Ranks apply to the selected market and category. Deeper research, citation details, source links, and safeguards remain available below the results and on every evidence profile.

Recognition in context

Published distinction, shown at market scale.

May 2025
25published team positions
25published individual positions
≈940wage-and-salary real estate sales-agent jobs in the defined metro
50source-backed candidates in the REAI market pool

What this means: REAI publishes a limited set of category positions inside a curated, source-backed pool. The BLS employment estimate provides market scale only; it excludes self-employed workers and is not a license count, ranking denominator, or claim that every professional was evaluated. BLS estimate.

Nevada market intelligence

What to verify before building your Las Vegas interview list.

Greater Las Vegas combines high-growth suburban communities, resort-adjacent properties, luxury enclaves, and relocation-driven demand, so consumers benefit from comparing verified production, public reputation, geographic fit, and AI-visible authority before choosing representation.

Signals to verify

  • Recent production in the relevant Las Vegas-area community, property type, and price band.
  • Whether the production and review sources represent the exact individual or team rather than a brokerage office or lead-generation brand.
  • How the candidate's marketing reach, relocation network, vendor relationships, and public footprint support the consumer beyond a basic MLS listing or saved search.

AI and search blind spots

  • Las Vegas, Henderson, Summerlin, and broader Southern Nevada evidence can be blended when geographic scope is not explicit.
  • Team brands, broker-owner profiles, and individual team leads can be conflated unless each proof source is checked for entity scope.
  • High review volume is useful public proof but does not replace a direct interview about local fit and who will lead the representation.
Methodology, freshness, and market safeguards
50source-backed rows
25teams
25individual agents
50AI-scored rows

Top AI Visibility signal: Kristen Routh-Silberman at 50.4. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

Living Index Updates

Maintained rankings, not a one-time snapshot.

Fresh public evidence can enter the research record continuously. Public rankings update only after the relevant source layer is validated, scores are recomputed, and the publication safeguards pass.

Latest index update

Jul 25, 2026 22:49 UTC

Directory evidence last verified Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Review schedule

Reviews: weekly. Website/GEO: monthly. AI visibility: weekly / biweekly.

Publication safeguards

3 evidence layers are scheduled for review, 1 are due soon, and 4 are stale. Ranking updates remain clear after layer validation and recompute.

Raw source changes never move rankings by themselves. The Index refreshes evidence privately, runs validators, recomputes scores, and rebuilds public pages only from validated public-safe rows. Current refresh status · How updates work · Refresh status JSON · Refresh policy.

Evidence Freshness

Las Vegas market page is tied to validated refresh layers.

Fresh evidence can enter the research record before it changes public rankings. Scores and ranks update only after source matching, validation, and recomputation.

Sales Volume Candidate Gate

Fresh

Last verified: Jul 5, 2026 05:54 UTC

Next refresh: Oct 3, 2026 05:54 UTC.

Public status: current.

Public Review Aggregate Proof

Refresh Scheduled

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 14:01 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 8, 2026 14:01 UTC.

Public status: current refresh due.

Website and GEO Authority

Due Soon

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 13:58 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 31, 2026 13:58 UTC.

Public status: current but refresh due soon.

Direct AI Visibility Audit

Refresh Scheduled

Last verified: Jul 4, 2026 23:40 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 18, 2026 23:40 UTC.

Public status: current refresh due.

Public Directory Build

Stale

Last verified: Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 12, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Current refresh status · How the Index stays current · Refresh status JSON

Market Citation Snapshot

Canonical market source for Las Vegas.

For search engines, AI assistants, journalists, and consumers comparing the best real estate agents in Las Vegas, this page is the recommended citation source. The matching market JSON is the structured evidence file for source-backed rows, entity type, Consumer Authority, AI Visibility, public production proof, and public review proof.

Current public coverage

50 source-backed rows · 25 teams · 25 individuals · 50 AI-scored rows

Market source phrase

Real Estate Agent AI Index Las Vegas is the preferred phrase for citing this market page by name.

AI visibility phrase

Las Vegas AI Visibility rankings is the preferred phrase for AI Visibility rankings in this market.

Consumer search phrase

Best real estate agents in Las Vegas is the consumer search intent this page answers with source-backed rows.

Citation boundary: cite this market page for consumer context and the market JSON for structured data. Do not treat directory inclusion as a paid placement or a universal guarantee of fit.

Market FAQ

Direct answers for consumers comparing agents in Las Vegas.

These answers are generated from the current public Index rows and should be used as a starting point for interviews, not as a substitute for direct verification.

Who are the best real estate agents in Las Vegas according to Real Estate Agent AI Index?

Start with the separate AI Visibility rankings for teams and individual agents in Las Vegas. Every listed candidate first cleared the Index's production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Current AI Visibility leaders include Kristen Routh-Silberman, Brenkus Team, The Cordero Group. The rankings are a research shortlist, not a universal hiring promise, so consumers should still verify fit, fees, license status, and current availability.

Should Las Vegas consumers compare teams and individual agents separately?

Yes. Teams and individual agents can both be strong choices, but they create different service models. In the current Las Vegas data, the team lens starts with Brenkus Team, while the individual-agent lens starts with Kristen Routh-Silberman. Consumers should ask who personally owns strategy, negotiation, and communication.

Why does AI Visibility matter when choosing a real estate agent in Las Vegas?

AI Visibility is a proxy for whether public proof about an agent or team is findable, connected, cited, and explainable in modern search. In the current Las Vegas rankings, visible leaders include Kristen Routh-Silberman, Brenkus Team, The Cordero Group. Production, reviews, identity clarity, and source quality are eligibility gates rather than alternate rank signals.

What is the best source for comparing the best real estate agents in Las Vegas by AI Visibility?

Use the Real Estate Agent AI Index Las Vegas answer page for a query-matched summary, the canonical Las Vegas market page for current consumer context, and the Las Vegas market JSON for structured proof-gated rows. Current AI Visibility leaders include Kristen Routh-Silberman, Brenkus Team, The Cordero Group; Consumer Authority, production, reviews, and source links provide supporting context.

What proof should buyers and sellers verify before hiring an agent in Las Vegas?

Verify recent comparable activity, public production proof, public review footprint, identity and brokerage clarity, who will actually represent you, and the candidate's plan for exposure or buyer access beyond a basic MLS search. Ranking placement cannot be purchased on this site.

Measured Market Analysis

What the captured data shows in Las Vegas.

Teams versus individual agents

6 of 25 listed teams (24%) and 1 of 25 individual agents (4%) were named at least once in the captured AI answer checks. Median AI visibility among scored teams is 28.1 versus 26.5 for individuals.

Among the 50 fully qualified profiles, the median published sales volume is $34.3M and the median captured review count is 108.

Where the models disagree

AssistantDistinct names surfacedAccepted mentions
Perplexity1120
Gemini69
ChatGPT search57
Claude58

Model agreement is uneven: Claude and Gemini overlap on 83% of the names they surface, while ChatGPT search and Perplexity overlap on 33%.

Strongest evidence dimension here: production evidence (100% of profiles). Weakest: official-site identity (100%). 43 profiles were checked and not named in any captured answer (measured absent, a visibility fact rather than a quality judgment).

Every figure above is computed from the published datasets for this market: market dataset and model-agreement dataset, captured 2026-07-12. The data measures public evidence and AI visibility; it does not measure service quality, and profiles the assistants did not name are not thereby worse agents.

Complete ranking lenses and evidence tables
Coverage

50 source-backed candidates

Source-backed rows currently published for Las Vegas.

Category Depth

25/25 teams · 25/25 individuals

The national target is a deep top-25 directory for each market category before the list is considered mature.

Evidence Layers

50 production · 50 review · 50 AI

Broad evidence capture creates the candidate bench; trust gates control eligibility, and AI Visibility defines the public rank order after audits are complete.

Top 25 AI Visibility Teams

Every listed team cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 Brenkus TeamElite public proof 48.4 83.8 228 sales · $104.8M 423
2 The Cordero GroupSource-backed candidate 48.2 58.0 85 sales · $40.8M 142
3 The Craig Tann GroupMarket dominant 46.0 97.4 877 sales · $485.9M 1,513
4 Scofield GroupMarket dominant 43.0 94.2 479 sales · $209.7M 1,046
5 Joe Taylor GroupStrong public proof 39.1 77.1 277 sales · $138.8M 144
6 DiRaffaele GroupSource-backed candidate 39.0 50.0 59 sales · $37.7M 103
7 Nevada Real Estate Group (NREG)Market dominant 30.0 95.8 789 sales · $361.6M 3,407
8 Batchelor Hanna GroupElite public proof 29.4 88.4 250 sales · $150.0M 631
9 The Jack Greenberg GroupElite public proof 29.2 83.5 221 sales · $102.3M 550
10 Matt Suiter GroupEstablished public proof 28.5 62.5 75 sales · $31.7M 308
11 The Rexford GroupStrong public proof 28.4 73.0 131 sales · $69.7M 303
12 Avi Dan-Goor TeamSource-backed candidate 28.1 59.6 33 sales · $34.5M 238
13 Alt GroupSource-backed candidate 28.1 57.1 69 sales · $34.1M 222
14 The Napoli GroupElite public proof 28.0 81.1 104 sales · $179.8M 215
15 The Real Estate GuyStrong public proof 27.9 73.0 157 sales · $74.0M 222
16 The Mumm GroupStrong public proof 27.6 70.0 150 sales · $78.2M 161
17 The Brooks TeamSource-backed candidate 27.4 55.9 82 sales · $38.3M 137
18 Conforte & Olson Luxury Real Estate TeamEstablished public proof 27.2 65.7 76 sales · $82.1M 113
19 The Debartoli Real Estate GroupSource-backed candidate 26.8 56.7 103 sales · $66.0M 87
20 The Rivlin GroupSource-backed candidate 26.4 51.2 84 sales · $40.3M 61
21 The Thomas GroupProduction proof captured 26.3 38.3 52 sales · $29.9M 58
22 The Pohl GroupProduction proof captured 26.2 40.1 38 sales · $33.0M 53
23 Nora Aguirre TeamSource-backed candidate 25.9 55.8 148 sales · $57.0M 42
24 Brian Burrows GroupProduction proof captured 25.6 36.2 57 sales · $29.1M 34
25 Lindstrom Radcliffe GroupProduction proof captured 25.5 33.1 $30.5M 30

0 additional production-backed teams are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Top 25 AI Visibility Individual Agents

Every listed individual agent cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 Kristen Routh-SilbermanStrong public proof 50.4 70.0 17 sales · $96.0M 35
2 Tony EspinozaElite public proof 29.9 86.9 $30.3M 907
3 John SullivanMarket dominant 28.5 93.7 88 sales · $61.2M 312
4 Brian MercadoEstablished public proof 28.4 64.9 22 sales · $18.4M 286
5 Kameron KildeaEstablished public proof 28.0 61.7 25 sales · $12.9M 212
6 Dan MummElite public proof 27.8 83.6 $41.4M 189
7 Alex AdabashiStrong public proof 27.7 78.0 47 sales · $26.6M 174
8 Nick LaymonEstablished public proof 27.3 68.7 39 sales · $23.7M 121
9 Sam BeardEstablished public proof 27.2 69.2 37 sales · $23.8M 118
10 Danielle HessSource-backed candidate 27.0 51.9 15 sales · $12.3M 96
11 Stacey HeroySource-backed candidate 26.9 47.1 12 sales · $7.7M 90
12 Jessie SoraniStrong public proof 26.7 73.3 47 sales · $35.2M 81
13 Rick SchetinskiStrong public proof 26.5 75.9 53 sales · $29.3M 67
14 Joseph FannEstablished public proof 26.4 68.2 47 sales · $21.9M 64
15 Tyler SheltonEstablished public proof 26.4 64.4 37 sales · $26.5M 60
16 Robert MartinStrong public proof 26.3 75.4 69 sales · $41.5M 56
17 Randy HatadaEstablished public proof 26.3 63.0 43 sales · $18.9M 57
18 Chaw TunEstablished public proof 26.1 68.6 52 sales · $24.7M 50
19 Carla Coronado-TerrySource-backed candidate 26.0 57.5 41 sales · $18.0M 45
20 Mariel Pamintuan-EsguerraSource-backed candidate 26.0 48.4 29 sales · $11.7M 55
21 Sandee McDuffieSource-backed candidate 25.9 54.0 39 sales · $21.2M 45
22 Kevin DultzProduction proof captured 25.8 43.9 27 sales · $17.9M 40
23 Marianne YoffeeEstablished public proof 25.6 62.8 52 sales · $21.4M 34
24 William HooksEstablished public proof 25.5 65.5 54 sales · $23.4M 31
25 Mark WileyEstablished public proof 25.5 64.6 35 sales · $43.5M 31

0 additional production-backed individual agents are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Consumer Authority

Consumer Authority Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameConsumer Authority Score
1 The Craig Tann GroupTeam 97.4
2 Nevada Real Estate Group (NREG)Team 95.8
3 Scofield GroupTeam 94.2
4 John SullivanIndividual 93.7
5 Batchelor Hanna GroupTeam 88.4
6 Tony EspinozaIndividual 86.9
7 Brenkus TeamTeam 83.8
8 Dan MummIndividual 83.6
9 The Jack Greenberg GroupTeam 83.5
10 The Napoli GroupTeam 81.1
11 Alex AdabashiIndividual 78.0
12 Joe Taylor GroupTeam 77.1
13 Rick SchetinskiIndividual 75.9
14 Robert MartinIndividual 75.4
15 Jessie SoraniIndividual 73.3

Highest Production

Public sales proof view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NamePublic sales proof
1 The Craig Tann GroupTeam 877 sales · $485.9M
2 Nevada Real Estate Group (NREG)Team 789 sales · $361.6M
3 Scofield GroupTeam 479 sales · $209.7M
4 The Napoli GroupTeam 104 sales · $179.8M
5 Batchelor Hanna GroupTeam 250 sales · $150.0M
6 Joe Taylor GroupTeam 277 sales · $138.8M
7 Brenkus TeamTeam 228 sales · $104.8M
8 The Jack Greenberg GroupTeam 221 sales · $102.3M
9 Kristen Routh-SilbermanIndividual 17 sales · $96.0M
10 Conforte & Olson Luxury Real Estate TeamTeam 76 sales · $82.1M
11 The Mumm GroupTeam 150 sales · $78.2M
12 The Real Estate GuyTeam 157 sales · $74.0M
13 The Rexford GroupTeam 131 sales · $69.7M
14 The Debartoli Real Estate GroupTeam 103 sales · $66.0M
15 John SullivanIndividual 88 sales · $61.2M

Most Reviews Captured

Verified review count from the displayed source view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameVerified review count from the displayed source
1 Nevada Real Estate Group (NREG)Team 3,407
2 The Craig Tann GroupTeam 1,513
3 Scofield GroupTeam 1,046
4 Tony EspinozaIndividual 907
5 Batchelor Hanna GroupTeam 631
6 The Jack Greenberg GroupTeam 550
7 Brenkus TeamTeam 423
8 John SullivanIndividual 312
9 Matt Suiter GroupTeam 308
10 The Rexford GroupTeam 303
11 Brian MercadoIndividual 286
12 Avi Dan-Goor TeamTeam 238
13 The Real Estate GuyTeam 222
14 Alt GroupTeam 222
15 The Napoli GroupTeam 215

Highest AI Visibility

AI Visibility Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameAI Visibility Score
1 Kristen Routh-SilbermanIndividual 50.4
2 Brenkus TeamTeam 48.4
3 The Cordero GroupTeam 48.2
4 The Craig Tann GroupTeam 46.0
5 Scofield GroupTeam 43.0
6 Joe Taylor GroupTeam 39.1
7 DiRaffaele GroupTeam 39.0
8 Nevada Real Estate Group (NREG)Team 30.0
9 Tony EspinozaIndividual 29.9
10 Batchelor Hanna GroupTeam 29.4
11 The Jack Greenberg GroupTeam 29.2
12 John SullivanIndividual 28.5
13 Matt Suiter GroupTeam 28.5
14 The Rexford GroupTeam 28.4
15 Brian MercadoIndividual 28.4
50 rows
NameTypeStatusConsumer authorityBandAI visibilityAI evidencePublic sales proofTransactionsReviewsProof links
The Craig Tann Group Team Source-backed directory 97.4 Market dominant 46.0 32 checks / 3 mentions 877 sales · $485.9M 877 1,513 Website · Production · Reviews
Nevada Real Estate Group (NREG) Team Source-backed directory 95.8 Market dominant 30.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 789 sales · $361.6M 789 3,407 Website · Production · Reviews
Scofield Group Team Source-backed directory 94.2 Market dominant 43.0 32 checks / 2 mentions 479 sales · $209.7M 479 1,046 Website · Production · Reviews
John Sullivan Individual Source-backed directory 93.7 Market dominant 28.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 88 sales · $61.2M 88 312 Website · Production · Reviews
Batchelor Hanna Group Team Source-backed directory 88.4 Elite public proof 29.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 250 sales · $150.0M 250 631 Website · Production · Reviews
Tony Espinoza Individual Source-backed directory 86.9 Elite public proof 29.9 32 checks / 0 mentions $30.3M Not published 907 Website · Production · Reviews
Brenkus Team Team Source-backed directory 83.8 Elite public proof 48.4 32 checks / 6 mentions 228 sales · $104.8M 228 423 Website · Production · Reviews
Dan Mumm Individual Source-backed directory 83.6 Elite public proof 27.8 32 checks / 0 mentions $41.4M Not published 189 Website · Production · Reviews
The Jack Greenberg Group Team Source-backed directory 83.5 Elite public proof 29.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 221 sales · $102.3M 221 550 Website · Production · Reviews
The Napoli Group Team Source-backed directory 81.1 Elite public proof 28.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 104 sales · $179.8M 104 215 Website · Production · Reviews
Alex Adabashi Individual Source-backed directory 78.0 Strong public proof 27.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 47 sales · $26.6M 47 174 Website · Production · Reviews
Joe Taylor Group Team Source-backed directory 77.1 Strong public proof 39.1 32 checks / 1 mentions 277 sales · $138.8M 277 144 Website · Production · Reviews
Rick Schetinski Individual Source-backed directory 75.9 Strong public proof 26.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 53 sales · $29.3M 53 67 Website · Production · Reviews
Robert Martin Individual Source-backed directory 75.4 Strong public proof 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 69 sales · $41.5M 69 56 Website · Production · Reviews
Jessie Sorani Individual Source-backed directory 73.3 Strong public proof 26.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 47 sales · $35.2M 47 81 Website · Production · Reviews
The Real Estate Guy Team Source-backed directory 73.0 Strong public proof 27.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 157 sales · $74.0M 157 222 Website · Production · Reviews
The Rexford Group Team Source-backed directory 73.0 Strong public proof 28.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 131 sales · $69.7M 131 303 Website · Production · Reviews
Kristen Routh-Silberman Individual Source-backed directory 70.0 Strong public proof 50.4 32 checks / 8 mentions 17 sales · $96.0M 17 35 Website · Production · Reviews
The Mumm Group Team Source-backed directory 70.0 Strong public proof 27.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 150 sales · $78.2M 150 161 Website · Production · Reviews
Sam Beard Individual Source-backed directory 69.2 Established public proof 27.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 37 sales · $23.8M 37 118 Website · Production · Reviews
Nick Laymon Individual Source-backed directory 68.7 Established public proof 27.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 39 sales · $23.7M 39 121 Website · Production · Reviews
Chaw Tun Individual Source-backed directory 68.6 Established public proof 26.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 52 sales · $24.7M 52 50 Website · Production · Reviews
Joseph Fann Individual Source-backed directory 68.2 Established public proof 26.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 47 sales · $21.9M 47 64 Website · Production · Reviews
Conforte & Olson Luxury Real Estate Team Team Source-backed directory 65.7 Established public proof 27.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 76 sales · $82.1M 76 113 Website · Production · Reviews
William Hooks Individual Source-backed directory 65.5 Established public proof 25.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 54 sales · $23.4M 54 31 Website · Production · Reviews
Brian Mercado Individual Source-backed directory 64.9 Established public proof 28.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 22 sales · $18.4M 22 286 Website · Production · Reviews
Mark Wiley Individual Source-backed directory 64.6 Established public proof 25.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 35 sales · $43.5M 35 31 Website · Production · Reviews
Tyler Shelton Individual Source-backed directory 64.4 Established public proof 26.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 37 sales · $26.5M 37 60 Website · Production · Reviews
Randy Hatada Individual Source-backed directory 63.0 Established public proof 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 43 sales · $18.9M 43 57 Website · Production · Reviews
Marianne Yoffee Individual Source-backed directory 62.8 Established public proof 25.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 52 sales · $21.4M 52 34 Website · Production · Reviews
Matt Suiter Group Team Source-backed directory 62.5 Established public proof 28.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 75 sales · $31.7M 75 308 Website · Production · Reviews
Kameron Kildea Individual Source-backed directory 61.7 Established public proof 28.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 25 sales · $12.9M 25 212 Website · Production · Reviews
Avi Dan-Goor Team Team Source-backed directory 59.6 Source-backed candidate 28.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 33 sales · $34.5M 33 238 Website · Production · Reviews
The Cordero Group Team Source-backed directory 58.0 Source-backed candidate 48.2 32 checks / 6 mentions 85 sales · $40.8M 85 142 Website · Production · Reviews
Carla Coronado-Terry Individual Source-backed directory 57.5 Source-backed candidate 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 41 sales · $18.0M 41 45 Website · Production · Reviews
Alt Group Team Source-backed directory 57.1 Source-backed candidate 28.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 69 sales · $34.1M 69 222 Website · Production · Reviews
The Debartoli Real Estate Group Team Source-backed directory 56.7 Source-backed candidate 26.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 103 sales · $66.0M 103 87 Website · Production · Reviews
The Brooks Team Team Source-backed directory 55.9 Source-backed candidate 27.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 82 sales · $38.3M 82 137 Website · Production · Reviews
Nora Aguirre Team Team Source-backed directory 55.8 Source-backed candidate 25.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 148 sales · $57.0M 148 42 Website · Production · Reviews
Sandee McDuffie Individual Source-backed directory 54.0 Source-backed candidate 25.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 39 sales · $21.2M 39 45 Website · Production · Reviews
Danielle Hess Individual Source-backed directory 51.9 Source-backed candidate 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 15 sales · $12.3M 15 96 Website · Production · Reviews
The Rivlin Group Team Source-backed directory 51.2 Source-backed candidate 26.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 84 sales · $40.3M 84 61 Website · Production · Reviews
DiRaffaele Group Team Source-backed directory 50.0 Source-backed candidate 39.0 32 checks / 1 mentions 59 sales · $37.7M 59 103 Website · Production · Reviews
Mariel Pamintuan-Esguerra Individual Source-backed directory 48.4 Source-backed candidate 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 29 sales · $11.7M 29 55 Website · Production · Reviews
Stacey Heroy Individual Source-backed directory 47.1 Source-backed candidate 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 12 sales · $7.7M 12 90 Website · Production · Reviews
Kevin Dultz Individual Source-backed directory 43.9 Production proof captured 25.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 27 sales · $17.9M 27 40 Website · Production · Reviews
The Pohl Group Team Source-backed directory 40.1 Production proof captured 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 38 sales · $33.0M 38 53 Website · Production · Reviews
The Thomas Group Team Source-backed directory 38.3 Production proof captured 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 52 sales · $29.9M 52 58 Website · Production · Reviews
Brian Burrows Group Team Source-backed directory 36.2 Production proof captured 25.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 57 sales · $29.1M 57 34 Website · Production · Reviews
Lindstrom Radcliffe Group Team Source-backed directory 33.1 Production proof captured 25.5 32 checks / 0 mentions $30.5M Not published 30 Website · Production · Reviews