Compare Louisville teams and individual agents by AI Visibility, verified production, reviews, and public market authority.
| Rank | Agent or team | AI Visibility | Verified production | Verified reviews captured | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Top 1 |
The Oatley TeamLouisville · Team | 44.7AI Visibility | 43 sales · $16.5M | 91Birdeye source | The Oatley Team evidence profile |
 Top 2 |
The Jimmy Welch TeamLouisville · Team | 39.9AI Visibility | 102 sales · $46.6M | 221Birdeye source | The Jimmy Welch Team evidence profile |
 Top 3 |
Team PruittLouisville · Team | 38.3AI Visibility | 73 sales · $24.1M | 44Birdeye source | Team Pruitt evidence profile |
| 4 | Jewell Smith GroupLouisville · Team | 28.2AI Visibility | 347 sales · $107.4M | 251Birdeye source | Jewell Smith Group evidence profile |
| 5 | The Stiller GroupLouisville · Team | 28.2AI Visibility | 190 sales · $64.2M | 253Birdeye source | The Stiller Group evidence profile |
| 6 | Elizabeth Monarch GroupLouisville · Team | 28.1AI Visibility | 84 sales · $28.7M | 263Birdeye source | Elizabeth Monarch Group evidence profile |
| 7 | Big Red TeamLouisville · Team | 28.0AI Visibility | 39 sales · $10.7M | 235Birdeye source | Big Red Team evidence profile |
| 8 | The David Bauer TeamLouisville · Team | 27.9AI Visibility | 179 sales · $77.8M | 192Birdeye source | The David Bauer Team evidence profile |
| 9 | Reed Estate GroupLouisville · Team | 27.7AI Visibility | 80 sales · $17.7M | 194Birdeye source | Reed Estate Group evidence profile |
| 10 | Teresa WallaceLouisville · Individual | 27.3AI Visibility | 33 sales · $11.2M | 121Experience.com source | Teresa Wallace evidence profile |
| 10 | The Hoagland TeamLouisville · Team | 27.1AI Visibility | 77 sales · $23.5M | 110Birdeye source | The Hoagland Team evidence profile |
| 11 | Team Panella powered by PLACELouisville · Team | 27.0AI Visibility | 64 sales · $19.1M | 109Birdeye source | Team Panella powered by PLACE evidence profile |
| 12 | Sincerity HomesLouisville · Team | 26.9AI Visibility | 42 sales · $11.6M | 90Birdeye source | Sincerity Homes evidence profile |
| 13 | Hundley Williams TeamLouisville · Team | 26.8AI Visibility | 70 sales · $23.1M | 86Birdeye source | Hundley Williams Team evidence profile |
| 14 | The Price GroupLouisville · Team | 26.8AI Visibility | 42 sales · $16.6M | 92Birdeye source | The Price Group evidence profile |
| 16 | Cathy JacksonLouisville · Individual | 26.7AI Visibility | 42 sales · $13.0M | 84Experience.com source | Cathy Jackson evidence profile |
| 17 | Benjamin ByrnLouisville · Individual | 26.7AI Visibility | 33 sales · $8.6M | 79Experience.com source | Benjamin Byrn evidence profile |
| 15 | The Beckman GroupLouisville · Team | 26.7AI Visibility | 43 sales · $18.5M | 79Birdeye source | The Beckman Group evidence profile |
| 19 | Bart MedlockLouisville · Individual | 26.6AI Visibility | 43 sales · $13.9M | 78Experience.com source | Bart Medlock evidence profile |
| 20 | Staci FlispartLouisville · Individual | 26.5AI Visibility | 88 sales · $29.6M | 67FastExpert source | Staci Flispart evidence profile |
| 21 | Linda LaPilusaLouisville · Individual | 26.4AI Visibility | 46 sales · $15.8M | 64Experience.com source | Linda LaPilusa evidence profile |
| 16 | Lewis Real Estate GroupLouisville · Team | 26.4AI Visibility | 42 sales · $12.1M | 62Birdeye source | Lewis Real Estate Group evidence profile |
| 23 | Sara CarpenterLouisville · Individual | 26.1AI Visibility | 33 sales · $10.1M | 50Experience.com source | Sara Carpenter evidence profile |
| 24 | Stephannie WilsonLouisville · Individual | 25.9AI Visibility | 148 sales · $46.1M | 43FastExpert source | Stephannie Wilson evidence profile |
| 25 | Dee Amber AndersonLouisville · Individual | 25.9AI Visibility | 26 sales · $15.6M | 43Experience.com source | Dee Amber Anderson evidence profile |
| 26 | Amanda BradenLouisville · Individual | 25.9AI Visibility | 42 sales · $13.4M | 41Experience.com source | Amanda Braden evidence profile |
| 27 | Shelley TuxworthLouisville · Individual | 25.9AI Visibility | 18 sales · $6.3M | 47RealSatisfied source | Shelley Tuxworth evidence profile |
| 28 | Vicky BouchardLouisville · Individual | 25.8AI Visibility | 24 sales · $7.8M | 40Experience.com source | Vicky Bouchard evidence profile |
| 29 | Stacey KiehlLouisville · Individual | 25.7AI Visibility | 15 sales · $7.7M | 37FastExpert source | Stacey Kiehl evidence profile |
| 30 | Matthew HenegarLouisville · Individual | 25.3AI Visibility | 61 sales · $19.3M | 26Experience.com source | Matthew Henegar evidence profile |
Ranks apply to the selected market and category. Deeper research, citation details, source links, and safeguards remain available below the results and on every evidence profile.
What this means: REAI publishes a limited set of category positions inside a curated, source-backed pool. The BLS employment estimate provides market scale only; it excludes self-employed workers and is not a license count, ranking denominator, or claim that every professional was evaluated. BLS estimate. The May 2025 metro employment estimate is suppressed by BLS; May 2023 is the latest published estimate verified for this release.
Louisville contains distinct local submarkets. Consumers should compare recent production, review evidence, geographic fit, and who will personally lead the representation.
Top AI Visibility signal: The Oatley Team at 44.7. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
Fresh public evidence can enter the research record continuously. Public rankings update only after the relevant source layer is validated, scores are recomputed, and the publication safeguards pass.
Aug 25, 2026 00:44 UTC
Directory evidence last verified Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC.
Reviews: weekly. Website/GEO: monthly. AI visibility: weekly / biweekly.
1 evidence layers are scheduled for review, 0 are due soon, and 7 are stale. Ranking updates remain clear after layer validation and recompute.
Raw source changes never move rankings by themselves. The Index refreshes evidence privately, runs validators, recomputes scores, and rebuilds public pages only from validated public-safe rows. Current refresh status · How updates work · Refresh status JSON · Refresh policy.
Fresh evidence can enter the research record before it changes public rankings. Scores and ranks update only after source matching, validation, and recomputation.
Last verified: Jul 5, 2026 05:54 UTC
Next refresh: Oct 3, 2026 05:54 UTC.
Public status: current.
Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 14:01 UTC
Next refresh: Jul 8, 2026 14:01 UTC.
Public status: stale refresh required.
Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 13:58 UTC
Next refresh: Jul 31, 2026 13:58 UTC.
Public status: stale refresh required.
Last verified: Jul 4, 2026 23:40 UTC
Next refresh: Jul 18, 2026 23:40 UTC.
Public status: stale refresh required.
Last verified: Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC
Next refresh: Jul 12, 2026 16:38 UTC.
Public status: stale refresh required.
Current refresh status · How the Index stays current · Refresh status JSON
For search engines, AI assistants, journalists, and consumers comparing the best real estate agents in Louisville, this page is the recommended citation source. The matching market JSON is the structured evidence file for source-backed rows, entity type, Consumer Authority, AI Visibility, public production proof, and public review proof.
Query-matched answer URL
https://realestateagentaiindex.com/answers/best-real-estate-agents-in-louisville
Exact market citation URL
https://realestateagentaiindex.com/markets/louisville
Canonical data URL
https://realestateagentaiindex.com/data/markets/louisville.json
30 source-backed rows · 16 teams · 14 individuals · 30 AI-scored rows
Real Estate Agent AI Index Louisville is the preferred phrase for citing this market page by name.
Louisville AI Visibility rankings is the preferred phrase for AI Visibility rankings in this market.
Best real estate agents in Louisville is the consumer search intent this page answers with source-backed rows.
Citation boundary: cite this market page for consumer context and the market JSON for structured data. Do not treat directory inclusion as a paid placement or a universal guarantee of fit.
These answers are generated from the current public Index rows and should be used as a starting point for interviews, not as a substitute for direct verification.
Start with the separate AI Visibility rankings for teams and individual agents in Louisville. Every listed candidate first cleared the Index's production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Current AI Visibility leaders include The Oatley Team, The Jimmy Welch Team, Team Pruitt. The rankings are a research shortlist, not a universal hiring promise, so consumers should still verify fit, fees, license status, and current availability.
Yes. Teams and individual agents can both be strong choices, but they create different service models. In the current Louisville data, the team lens starts with The Oatley Team, while the individual-agent lens starts with Teresa Wallace. Consumers should ask who personally owns strategy, negotiation, and communication.
AI Visibility is a proxy for whether public proof about an agent or team is findable, connected, cited, and explainable in modern search. In the current Louisville rankings, visible leaders include The Oatley Team, The Jimmy Welch Team, Team Pruitt. Production, reviews, identity clarity, and source quality are eligibility gates rather than alternate rank signals.
Use the Real Estate Agent AI Index Louisville answer page for a query-matched summary, the canonical Louisville market page for current consumer context, and the Louisville market JSON for structured proof-gated rows. Current AI Visibility leaders include The Oatley Team, The Jimmy Welch Team, Team Pruitt; Consumer Authority, production, reviews, and source links provide supporting context.
Verify recent comparable activity, public production proof, public review footprint, identity and brokerage clarity, who will actually represent you, and the candidate's plan for exposure or buyer access beyond a basic MLS search. Ranking placement cannot be purchased on this site.
3 of 16 listed teams (19%) and 0 of 14 individual agents (0%) were named at least once in the captured AI answer checks. Median AI visibility among scored teams is 27.8 versus 26.0 for individuals.
Among the 30 fully qualified profiles, the median published sales volume is $16.5M and the median captured review count is 81.5.
| Assistant | Distinct names surfaced | Accepted mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Perplexity | 2 | 2 |
| openai/gpt-5.6-sol | 2 | 2 |
| Claude | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini | 1 | 1 |
Model agreement is uneven: Claude and Gemini overlap on 100% of the names they surface, while openai/gpt-5.6-sol and Perplexity overlap on 33%.
Strongest evidence dimension here: production evidence (100% of profiles). Weakest: official-site identity (100%). 27 profiles were checked and not named in any captured answer (measured absent, a visibility fact rather than a quality judgment).
Every figure above is computed from the published datasets for this market: market dataset and model-agreement dataset, captured 2026-08-19. The data measures public evidence and AI visibility; it does not measure service quality, and profiles the assistants did not name are not thereby worse agents.
Source-backed rows currently published for Louisville.
The national target is a deep top-25 directory for each market category before the list is considered mature.
Broad evidence capture creates the candidate bench; trust gates control eligibility, and AI Visibility defines the public rank order after audits are complete.
Every listed team cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.
| # | Name | AI visibility | Authority | Sales proof | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Oatley TeamSource-backed candidate | 44.7 | 53.6 | 43 sales · $16.5M | 91 |
| 2 | The Jimmy Welch TeamElite public proof | 39.9 | 84.0 | 102 sales · $46.6M | 221 |
| 3 | Team PruittSource-backed candidate | 38.3 | 55.8 | 73 sales · $24.1M | 44 |
| 4 | Jewell Smith GroupMarket dominant | 28.2 | 95.3 | 347 sales · $107.4M | 251 |
| 5 | The Stiller GroupMarket dominant | 28.2 | 94.7 | 190 sales · $64.2M | 253 |
| 6 | Elizabeth Monarch GroupElite public proof | 28.1 | 83.4 | 84 sales · $28.7M | 263 |
| 7 | Big Red TeamSource-backed candidate | 28.0 | 52.1 | 39 sales · $10.7M | 235 |
| 8 | The David Bauer TeamElite public proof | 27.9 | 85.2 | 179 sales · $77.8M | 192 |
| 9 | Reed Estate GroupStrong public proof | 27.7 | 73.3 | 80 sales · $17.7M | 194 |
| 10 | The Hoagland TeamEstablished public proof | 27.1 | 68.7 | 77 sales · $23.5M | 110 |
| 11 | Team Panella powered by PLACEEstablished public proof | 27.0 | 61.8 | 64 sales · $19.1M | 109 |
| 12 | Sincerity HomesSource-backed candidate | 26.9 | 45.5 | 42 sales · $11.6M | 90 |
| 13 | Hundley Williams TeamSource-backed candidate | 26.8 | 58.6 | 70 sales · $23.1M | 86 |
| 14 | The Price GroupSource-backed candidate | 26.8 | 46.7 | 42 sales · $16.6M | 92 |
| 15 | The Beckman GroupSource-backed candidate | 26.7 | 49.8 | 43 sales · $18.5M | 79 |
| 16 | Lewis Real Estate GroupProduction proof captured | 26.4 | 37.9 | 42 sales · $12.1M | 62 |
0 additional production-backed teams are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.
Every listed individual agent cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.
| # | Name | AI visibility | Authority | Sales proof | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teresa WallaceStrong public proof | 27.3 | 73.7 | 33 sales · $11.2M | 121 |
| 2 | Cathy JacksonStrong public proof | 26.7 | 78.6 | 42 sales · $13.0M | 84 |
| 3 | Benjamin ByrnEstablished public proof | 26.7 | 69.3 | 33 sales · $8.6M | 79 |
| 4 | Bart MedlockStrong public proof | 26.6 | 78.5 | 43 sales · $13.9M | 78 |
| 5 | Staci FlispartElite public proof | 26.5 | 84.9 | 88 sales · $29.6M | 67 |
| 6 | Linda LaPilusaStrong public proof | 26.4 | 77.0 | 46 sales · $15.8M | 64 |
| 7 | Sara CarpenterEstablished public proof | 26.1 | 60.5 | 33 sales · $10.1M | 50 |
| 8 | Stephannie WilsonStrong public proof | 25.9 | 77.9 | 148 sales · $46.1M | 43 |
| 9 | Dee Amber AndersonEstablished public proof | 25.9 | 66.5 | 26 sales · $15.6M | 43 |
| 10 | Amanda BradenSource-backed candidate | 25.9 | 59.0 | 42 sales · $13.4M | 41 |
| 11 | Shelley TuxworthSource-backed candidate | 25.9 | 46.9 | 18 sales · $6.3M | 47 |
| 12 | Vicky BouchardProduction proof captured | 25.8 | 41.1 | 24 sales · $7.8M | 40 |
| 13 | Stacey KiehlProduction proof captured | 25.7 | 36.1 | 15 sales · $7.7M | 37 |
| 14 | Matthew HenegarEstablished public proof | 25.3 | 62.4 | 61 sales · $19.3M | 26 |
0 additional production-backed individual agents are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.
Consumer Authority Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
| # | Name | Consumer Authority Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jewell Smith GroupTeam | 95.3 |
| 2 | The Stiller GroupTeam | 94.7 |
| 3 | The David Bauer TeamTeam | 85.2 |
| 4 | Staci FlispartIndividual | 84.9 |
| 5 | The Jimmy Welch TeamTeam | 84.0 |
| 6 | Elizabeth Monarch GroupTeam | 83.4 |
| 7 | Cathy JacksonIndividual | 78.6 |
| 8 | Bart MedlockIndividual | 78.5 |
| 9 | Stephannie WilsonIndividual | 77.9 |
| 10 | Linda LaPilusaIndividual | 77.0 |
| 11 | Teresa WallaceIndividual | 73.7 |
| 12 | Reed Estate GroupTeam | 73.3 |
| 13 | Benjamin ByrnIndividual | 69.3 |
| 14 | The Hoagland TeamTeam | 68.7 |
| 15 | Dee Amber AndersonIndividual | 66.5 |
Public sales proof view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
| # | Name | Public sales proof |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jewell Smith GroupTeam | 347 sales · $107.4M |
| 2 | The David Bauer TeamTeam | 179 sales · $77.8M |
| 3 | The Stiller GroupTeam | 190 sales · $64.2M |
| 4 | The Jimmy Welch TeamTeam | 102 sales · $46.6M |
| 5 | Stephannie WilsonIndividual | 148 sales · $46.1M |
| 6 | Staci FlispartIndividual | 88 sales · $29.6M |
| 7 | Elizabeth Monarch GroupTeam | 84 sales · $28.7M |
| 8 | Team PruittTeam | 73 sales · $24.1M |
| 9 | The Hoagland TeamTeam | 77 sales · $23.5M |
| 10 | Hundley Williams TeamTeam | 70 sales · $23.1M |
| 11 | Matthew HenegarIndividual | 61 sales · $19.3M |
| 12 | Team Panella powered by PLACETeam | 64 sales · $19.1M |
| 13 | The Beckman GroupTeam | 43 sales · $18.5M |
| 14 | Reed Estate GroupTeam | 80 sales · $17.7M |
| 15 | The Price GroupTeam | 42 sales · $16.6M |
Verified review count from the displayed source view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
| # | Name | Verified review count from the displayed source |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elizabeth Monarch GroupTeam | 263 |
| 2 | The Stiller GroupTeam | 253 |
| 3 | Jewell Smith GroupTeam | 251 |
| 4 | Big Red TeamTeam | 235 |
| 5 | The Jimmy Welch TeamTeam | 221 |
| 6 | Reed Estate GroupTeam | 194 |
| 7 | The David Bauer TeamTeam | 192 |
| 8 | Teresa WallaceIndividual | 121 |
| 9 | The Hoagland TeamTeam | 110 |
| 10 | Team Panella powered by PLACETeam | 109 |
| 11 | The Price GroupTeam | 92 |
| 12 | The Oatley TeamTeam | 91 |
| 13 | Sincerity HomesTeam | 90 |
| 14 | Hundley Williams TeamTeam | 86 |
| 15 | Cathy JacksonIndividual | 84 |
AI Visibility Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
| # | Name | AI Visibility Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Oatley TeamTeam | 44.7 |
| 2 | The Jimmy Welch TeamTeam | 39.9 |
| 3 | Team PruittTeam | 38.3 |
| 4 | Jewell Smith GroupTeam | 28.2 |
| 5 | The Stiller GroupTeam | 28.2 |
| 6 | Elizabeth Monarch GroupTeam | 28.1 |
| 7 | Big Red TeamTeam | 28.0 |
| 8 | The David Bauer TeamTeam | 27.9 |
| 9 | Reed Estate GroupTeam | 27.7 |
| 10 | Teresa WallaceIndividual | 27.3 |
| 11 | The Hoagland TeamTeam | 27.1 |
| 12 | Team Panella powered by PLACETeam | 27.0 |
| 13 | Sincerity HomesTeam | 26.9 |
| 14 | Hundley Williams TeamTeam | 26.8 |
| 15 | The Price GroupTeam | 26.8 |
| Name | Type | Status | Consumer authority | Band | AI visibility | AI evidence | Public sales proof | Transactions | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jewell Smith Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 95.3 | Market dominant | 28.2 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 347 sales · $107.4M | 347 | 251 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Stiller Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 94.7 | Market dominant | 28.2 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 190 sales · $64.2M | 190 | 253 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The David Bauer Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 85.2 | Elite public proof | 27.9 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 179 sales · $77.8M | 179 | 192 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Staci Flispart | Individual | Source-backed directory | 84.9 | Elite public proof | 26.5 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 88 sales · $29.6M | 88 | 67 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Jimmy Welch Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 84.0 | Elite public proof | 39.9 | 32 checks / 1 mentions | 102 sales · $46.6M | 102 | 221 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Elizabeth Monarch Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 83.4 | Elite public proof | 28.1 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 84 sales · $28.7M | 84 | 263 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Cathy Jackson | Individual | Source-backed directory | 78.6 | Strong public proof | 26.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 42 sales · $13.0M | 42 | 84 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Bart Medlock | Individual | Source-backed directory | 78.5 | Strong public proof | 26.6 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 43 sales · $13.9M | 43 | 78 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Stephannie Wilson | Individual | Source-backed directory | 77.9 | Strong public proof | 25.9 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 148 sales · $46.1M | 148 | 43 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Linda LaPilusa | Individual | Source-backed directory | 77.0 | Strong public proof | 26.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 46 sales · $15.8M | 46 | 64 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Teresa Wallace | Individual | Source-backed directory | 73.7 | Strong public proof | 27.3 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 33 sales · $11.2M | 33 | 121 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Reed Estate Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 73.3 | Strong public proof | 27.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 80 sales · $17.7M | 80 | 194 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Benjamin Byrn | Individual | Source-backed directory | 69.3 | Established public proof | 26.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 33 sales · $8.6M | 33 | 79 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Hoagland Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 68.7 | Established public proof | 27.1 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 77 sales · $23.5M | 77 | 110 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Dee Amber Anderson | Individual | Source-backed directory | 66.5 | Established public proof | 25.9 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 26 sales · $15.6M | 26 | 43 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Matthew Henegar | Individual | Source-backed directory | 62.4 | Established public proof | 25.3 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 61 sales · $19.3M | 61 | 26 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Team Panella powered by PLACE | Team | Source-backed directory | 61.8 | Established public proof | 27.0 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 64 sales · $19.1M | 64 | 109 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Sara Carpenter | Individual | Source-backed directory | 60.5 | Established public proof | 26.1 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 33 sales · $10.1M | 33 | 50 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Amanda Braden | Individual | Source-backed directory | 59.0 | Source-backed candidate | 25.9 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 42 sales · $13.4M | 42 | 41 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Hundley Williams Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 58.6 | Source-backed candidate | 26.8 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 70 sales · $23.1M | 70 | 86 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Team Pruitt | Team | Source-backed directory | 55.8 | Source-backed candidate | 38.3 | 32 checks / 1 mentions | 73 sales · $24.1M | 73 | 44 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Oatley Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 53.6 | Source-backed candidate | 44.7 | 32 checks / 4 mentions | 43 sales · $16.5M | 43 | 91 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Big Red Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 52.1 | Source-backed candidate | 28.0 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 39 sales · $10.7M | 39 | 235 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Beckman Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 49.8 | Source-backed candidate | 26.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 43 sales · $18.5M | 43 | 79 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Shelley Tuxworth | Individual | Source-backed directory | 46.9 | Source-backed candidate | 25.9 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 18 sales · $6.3M | 18 | 47 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Price Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 46.7 | Source-backed candidate | 26.8 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 42 sales · $16.6M | 42 | 92 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Sincerity Homes | Team | Source-backed directory | 45.5 | Source-backed candidate | 26.9 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 42 sales · $11.6M | 42 | 90 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Vicky Bouchard | Individual | Source-backed directory | 41.1 | Production proof captured | 25.8 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 24 sales · $7.8M | 24 | 40 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Lewis Real Estate Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 37.9 | Production proof captured | 26.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 42 sales · $12.1M | 42 | 62 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Stacey Kiehl | Individual | Source-backed directory | 36.1 | Production proof captured | 25.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 15 sales · $7.7M | 15 | 37 | Website · Production · Reviews |