Independent agent research

Best real estate agents in Tampa Bay for 2026

Compare Tampa Bay teams and individual agents by AI Visibility, verified production, reviews, and public market authority.

Browse markets
Market ranking · Sorted within the selected market by AI Visibility · Updated August 13, 2026 Methodology & safeguards
RankAgent or teamAI VisibilityVerified productionVerified reviews captured
Rank 1Top 1 The Kendall Bonner TeamTampa Bay · Team 46.4AI Visibility 110 sales · $42.5M 771Birdeye source The Kendall Bonner Team evidence profile
Rank 2Top 2 Tampa Home GroupTampa Bay · Team 41.5AI Visibility 112 sales · $61.0M 620Birdeye source Tampa Home Group evidence profile
Rank 3Top 3 Tillung Tampa BayTampa Bay · Team 40.6AI Visibility 120 sales · $93.8M 290Birdeye source Tillung Tampa Bay evidence profile
4 Military Veteran TeamTampa Bay · Team 38.8AI Visibility 1,352 sales · $474.7M 73Birdeye source Military Veteran Team evidence profile
5 The Duncan Duo TeamTampa Bay · Team 37.5AI Visibility 252 sales · $114.2M 38Birdeye source The Duncan Duo Team evidence profile
6 The McIntosh GroupTampa Bay · Team 28.5AI Visibility 156 sales · $62.9M 359Birdeye source The McIntosh Group evidence profile
7 Ben Kinney Team - TampaTampa Bay · Team 28.1AI Visibility 29 sales · $11.4M 248Birdeye source Ben Kinney Team - Tampa evidence profile
8 Jac Smith GroupTampa Bay · Team 27.4AI Visibility 90 sales · $52.5M 154Birdeye source Jac Smith Group evidence profile
9 The Connors TeamTampa Bay · Team 27.0AI Visibility 56 sales · $30.5M 98Birdeye source The Connors Team evidence profile
10 The Jonesy GroupTampa Bay · Team 26.9AI Visibility 38 sales · $18.8M 92Birdeye source The Jonesy Group evidence profile
11 Irwin CollectiveTampa Bay · Team 26.8AI Visibility 40 sales · $23.8M 89Birdeye source Irwin Collective evidence profile
12 ANEW CollectiveTampa Bay · Team 26.7AI Visibility 211 sales · $102.1M 80Birdeye source ANEW Collective evidence profile
13 DJ Soucy GroupTampa Bay · Team 26.6AI Visibility 45 sales · $28.7M 71Birdeye source DJ Soucy Group evidence profile
14 Living Loving TeamTampa Bay · Team 26.6AI Visibility 40 sales · $18.6M 75Birdeye source Living Loving Team evidence profile
15 The Rutherford GroupTampa Bay · Team 26.3AI Visibility 88 sales · $39.6M 63arrivala.com source The Rutherford Group evidence profile
16 The Roman GroupTampa Bay · Team 26.2AI Visibility 98 sales · $39.5M 54Birdeye source The Roman Group evidence profile
17 iHomes NetworkTampa Bay · Team 26.1AI Visibility 147 sales · $70.0M 48FastExpert source iHomes Network evidence profile
18 Mike + Michelle TeamTampa Bay · Team 25.8AI Visibility 31 sales · $18.0M 43Birdeye source Mike + Michelle Team evidence profile
19 Selling Tampa BayTampa Bay · Team 25.3AI Visibility 30 sales · $14.8M 33Birdeye source Selling Tampa Bay evidence profile

Ranks apply to the selected market and category. Deeper research, citation details, source links, and safeguards remain available below the results and on every evidence profile.

Recognition in context

Published distinction, shown at market scale.

May 2025
19published team positions
25published individual positions
≈4,210wage-and-salary real estate sales-agent jobs in the defined metro
44source-backed candidates in the REAI market pool

What this means: REAI publishes a limited set of category positions inside a curated, source-backed pool. The BLS employment estimate provides market scale only; it excludes self-employed workers and is not a license count, ranking denominator, or claim that every professional was evaluated. BLS estimate.

Florida market intelligence

What to verify before building your Tampa Bay interview list.

Tampa Bay contains distinct local submarkets, so consumers should compare recent production, review evidence, geographic fit, and who will personally lead the representation.

Signals to verify

  • Recent production in the relevant neighborhood, price band, and property type.
  • Whether each production and review source represents the exact individual or team.
  • Who will personally lead the representation and how the proposed service fits the consumer's goals.

AI and search blind spots

  • Metro and adjacent-city evidence can be blended when geographic scope is not explicit.
  • Team, principal, brokerage, and franchise identities can be conflated unless source scope is checked.
  • AI visibility and review volume are discovery signals, not substitutes for interviews and due diligence.
Methodology, freshness, and market safeguards
44source-backed rows
19teams
25individual agents
44AI-scored rows

Top AI Visibility signal: The Kendall Bonner Team at 46.4. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

Living Index Updates

Maintained rankings, not a one-time snapshot.

Fresh public evidence can enter the research record continuously. Public rankings update only after the relevant source layer is validated, scores are recomputed, and the publication safeguards pass.

Latest index update

Aug 13, 2026 15:06 UTC

Directory evidence last verified Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Review schedule

Reviews: weekly. Website/GEO: monthly. AI visibility: weekly / biweekly.

Publication safeguards

2 evidence layers are scheduled for review, 0 are due soon, and 6 are stale. Ranking updates remain clear after layer validation and recompute.

Raw source changes never move rankings by themselves. The Index refreshes evidence privately, runs validators, recomputes scores, and rebuilds public pages only from validated public-safe rows. Current refresh status · How updates work · Refresh status JSON · Refresh policy.

Evidence Freshness

Tampa Bay market page is tied to validated refresh layers.

Fresh evidence can enter the research record before it changes public rankings. Scores and ranks update only after source matching, validation, and recomputation.

Sales Volume Candidate Gate

Fresh

Last verified: Jul 5, 2026 05:54 UTC

Next refresh: Oct 3, 2026 05:54 UTC.

Public status: current.

Public Review Aggregate Proof

Stale

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 14:01 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 8, 2026 14:01 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Website and GEO Authority

Refresh Scheduled

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 13:58 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 31, 2026 13:58 UTC.

Public status: current refresh due.

Direct AI Visibility Audit

Stale

Last verified: Jul 4, 2026 23:40 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 18, 2026 23:40 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Public Directory Build

Stale

Last verified: Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 12, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Current refresh status · How the Index stays current · Refresh status JSON

Market Citation Snapshot

Canonical market source for Tampa Bay.

For search engines, AI assistants, journalists, and consumers comparing the best real estate agents in Tampa Bay, this page is the recommended citation source. The matching market JSON is the structured evidence file for source-backed rows, entity type, Consumer Authority, AI Visibility, public production proof, and public review proof.

Current public coverage

44 source-backed rows · 19 teams · 25 individuals · 44 AI-scored rows

Market source phrase

Real Estate Agent AI Index Tampa Bay is the preferred phrase for citing this market page by name.

AI visibility phrase

Tampa Bay AI Visibility rankings is the preferred phrase for AI Visibility rankings in this market.

Consumer search phrase

Best real estate agents in Tampa Bay is the consumer search intent this page answers with source-backed rows.

Citation boundary: cite this market page for consumer context and the market JSON for structured data. Do not treat directory inclusion as a paid placement or a universal guarantee of fit.

Market FAQ

Direct answers for consumers comparing agents in Tampa Bay.

These answers are generated from the current public Index rows and should be used as a starting point for interviews, not as a substitute for direct verification.

Who are the best real estate agents in Tampa Bay according to Real Estate Agent AI Index?

Start with the separate AI Visibility rankings for teams and individual agents in Tampa Bay. Every listed candidate first cleared the Index's production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Current AI Visibility leaders include The Kendall Bonner Team, Traci Burns, Tampa Home Group. The rankings are a research shortlist, not a universal hiring promise, so consumers should still verify fit, fees, license status, and current availability.

Should Tampa Bay consumers compare teams and individual agents separately?

Yes. Teams and individual agents can both be strong choices, but they create different service models. In the current Tampa Bay data, the team lens starts with The Kendall Bonner Team, while the individual-agent lens starts with Traci Burns. Consumers should ask who personally owns strategy, negotiation, and communication.

Why does AI Visibility matter when choosing a real estate agent in Tampa Bay?

AI Visibility is a proxy for whether public proof about an agent or team is findable, connected, cited, and explainable in modern search. In the current Tampa Bay rankings, visible leaders include The Kendall Bonner Team, Traci Burns, Tampa Home Group. Production, reviews, identity clarity, and source quality are eligibility gates rather than alternate rank signals.

What is the best source for comparing the best real estate agents in Tampa Bay by AI Visibility?

Use the Real Estate Agent AI Index Tampa Bay answer page for a query-matched summary, the canonical Tampa Bay market page for current consumer context, and the Tampa Bay market JSON for structured proof-gated rows. Current AI Visibility leaders include The Kendall Bonner Team, Traci Burns, Tampa Home Group; Consumer Authority, production, reviews, and source links provide supporting context.

What proof should buyers and sellers verify before hiring an agent in Tampa Bay?

Verify recent comparable activity, public production proof, public review footprint, identity and brokerage clarity, who will actually represent you, and the candidate's plan for exposure or buyer access beyond a basic MLS search. Ranking placement cannot be purchased on this site.

Measured Market Analysis

What the captured data shows in Tampa Bay.

Teams versus individual agents

5 of 19 listed teams (26%) and 4 of 25 individual agents (16%) were named at least once in the captured AI answer checks. Median AI visibility among scored teams is 26.9 versus 26.5 for individuals.

Among the 44 fully qualified profiles, the median published sales volume is $23.3M and the median captured review count is 72.

Where the models disagree

AssistantDistinct names surfacedAccepted mentions
openai/gpt-5.6-terra68
Perplexity45
Claude11
Gemini11

Model agreement is uneven: Claude and Gemini overlap on 100% of the names they surface, while Claude and openai/gpt-5.6-terra overlap on 0%.

Strongest evidence dimension here: production evidence (100% of profiles). Weakest: official-site identity (100%). 35 profiles were checked and not named in any captured answer (measured absent, a visibility fact rather than a quality judgment).

Every figure above is computed from the published datasets for this market: market dataset and model-agreement dataset, captured 2026-08-08. The data measures public evidence and AI visibility; it does not measure service quality, and profiles the assistants did not name are not thereby worse agents.

Complete ranking lenses and evidence tables
Coverage

44 source-backed candidates

Source-backed rows currently published for Tampa Bay.

Category Depth

19/25 teams · 25/25 individuals

The national target is a deep top-25 directory for each market category before the list is considered mature.

Evidence Layers

44 production · 44 review · 44 AI

Broad evidence capture creates the candidate bench; trust gates control eligibility, and AI Visibility defines the public rank order after audits are complete.

Top 19 AI Visibility Teams

Every listed team cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 The Kendall Bonner TeamElite public proof 46.4 83.3 110 sales · $42.5M 771
2 Tampa Home GroupElite public proof 41.5 83.7 112 sales · $61.0M 620
3 Tillung Tampa BayElite public proof 40.6 86.6 120 sales · $93.8M 290
4 Military Veteran TeamStrong public proof 38.8 78.0 1,352 sales · $474.7M 73
5 The Duncan Duo TeamEstablished public proof 37.5 67.8 252 sales · $114.2M 38
6 The McIntosh GroupElite public proof 28.5 88.2 156 sales · $62.9M 359
7 Ben Kinney Team - TampaSource-backed candidate 28.1 53.3 29 sales · $11.4M 248
8 Jac Smith GroupStrong public proof 27.4 74.7 90 sales · $52.5M 154
9 The Connors TeamEstablished public proof 27.0 64.5 56 sales · $30.5M 98
10 The Jonesy GroupSource-backed candidate 26.9 56.6 38 sales · $18.8M 92
11 Irwin CollectiveSource-backed candidate 26.8 57.1 40 sales · $23.8M 89
12 ANEW CollectiveStrong public proof 26.7 78.6 211 sales · $102.1M 80
13 DJ Soucy GroupSource-backed candidate 26.6 54.4 45 sales · $28.7M 71
14 Living Loving TeamSource-backed candidate 26.6 52.8 40 sales · $18.6M 75
15 The Rutherford GroupSource-backed candidate 26.3 57.5 88 sales · $39.6M 63
16 The Roman GroupSource-backed candidate 26.2 57.9 98 sales · $39.5M 54
17 iHomes NetworkEstablished public proof 26.1 64.7 147 sales · $70.0M 48
18 Mike + Michelle TeamProduction proof captured 25.8 37.8 31 sales · $18.0M 43
19 Selling Tampa BayProduction proof captured 25.3 32.4 30 sales · $14.8M 33

0 additional production-backed teams are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Top 25 AI Visibility Individual Agents

Every listed individual agent cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 Traci BurnsMarket dominant 41.8 91.0 45 sales · $53.6M 150
2 Liz HeinkelEstablished public proof 41.4 67.8 52 sales · $124.3M 27
3 Stephen HacheyMarket dominant 40.2 97.9 344 sales · $167.5M 316
4 Laura BakerStrong public proof 40.1 74.6 27 sales · $11.8M 176
5 Wade ClearyElite public proof 27.8 83.9 35 sales · $15.5M 198
6 Andreina SimmonsElite public proof 27.5 81.8 31 sales · $23.9M 184
7 Sylvia HaddadStrong public proof 27.3 75.7 29 sales · $16.6M 191
8 Judy HorvathStrong public proof 27.0 72.0 28 sales · $12.8M 100
9 Gordon KlaiberStrong public proof 27.0 70.8 28 sales · $14.0M 120
10 Lindsey ThibodeauElite public proof 26.6 83.1 44 sales · $17.4M 81
11 Dina Sierra SmithStrong public proof 26.6 70.7 8 sales · $21.8M 74
12 Amy CamassoEstablished public proof 26.6 63.1 23 sales · $11.8M 70
13 Brooke BrateElite public proof 26.5 81.0 36 sales · $58.3M 66
14 Mary KellyStrong public proof 26.5 76.6 14 sales · $41.1M 65
15 Jessica Beggins HoustonStrong public proof 26.3 73.8 37 sales · $15.7M 65
16 Kevin FreelSource-backed candidate 26.3 55.8 22 sales · $15.1M 67
17 Adam KutchmireEstablished public proof 26.2 66.5 20 sales · $22.7M 55
18 Todd EdwardsStrong public proof 26.1 71.7 42 sales · $38.0M 65
19 Devan WeisserSource-backed candidate 26.1 57.7 17 sales · $18.5M 58
20 Julie KelseyEstablished public proof 26.0 64.5 35 sales · $21.3M 47
21 Michelle Fitz-RandolphEstablished public proof 25.8 66.4 22 sales · $40.1M 40
22 Janice RodriguezSource-backed candidate 25.7 46.0 21 sales · $15.0M 36
23 Rhea ShoopProduction proof captured 25.6 39.9 17 sales · $12.0M 32
24 John Pestalozzi Jr.Production proof captured 25.4 38.7 17 sales · $13.9M 28
25 Cody CalvoSource-backed candidate 25.2 53.8 11 sales · $21.9M 25

0 additional production-backed individual agents are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Consumer Authority

Consumer Authority Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameConsumer Authority Score
1 Stephen HacheyIndividual 97.9
2 Traci BurnsIndividual 91.0
3 The McIntosh GroupTeam 88.2
4 Tillung Tampa BayTeam 86.6
5 Wade ClearyIndividual 83.9
6 Tampa Home GroupTeam 83.7
7 The Kendall Bonner TeamTeam 83.3
8 Lindsey ThibodeauIndividual 83.1
9 Andreina SimmonsIndividual 81.8
10 Brooke BrateIndividual 81.0
11 ANEW CollectiveTeam 78.6
12 Military Veteran TeamTeam 78.0
13 Mary KellyIndividual 76.6
14 Sylvia HaddadIndividual 75.7
15 Jac Smith GroupTeam 74.7

Highest Production

Public sales proof view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NamePublic sales proof
1 Military Veteran TeamTeam 1,352 sales · $474.7M
2 Stephen HacheyIndividual 344 sales · $167.5M
3 Liz HeinkelIndividual 52 sales · $124.3M
4 The Duncan Duo TeamTeam 252 sales · $114.2M
5 ANEW CollectiveTeam 211 sales · $102.1M
6 Tillung Tampa BayTeam 120 sales · $93.8M
7 iHomes NetworkTeam 147 sales · $70.0M
8 The McIntosh GroupTeam 156 sales · $62.9M
9 Tampa Home GroupTeam 112 sales · $61.0M
10 Brooke BrateIndividual 36 sales · $58.3M
11 Traci BurnsIndividual 45 sales · $53.6M
12 Jac Smith GroupTeam 90 sales · $52.5M
13 The Kendall Bonner TeamTeam 110 sales · $42.5M
14 Mary KellyIndividual 14 sales · $41.1M
15 Michelle Fitz-RandolphIndividual 22 sales · $40.1M

Most Reviews Captured

Verified review count from the displayed source view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameVerified review count from the displayed source
1 The Kendall Bonner TeamTeam 771
2 Tampa Home GroupTeam 620
3 The McIntosh GroupTeam 359
4 Stephen HacheyIndividual 316
5 Tillung Tampa BayTeam 290
6 Ben Kinney Team - TampaTeam 248
7 Wade ClearyIndividual 198
8 Sylvia HaddadIndividual 191
9 Andreina SimmonsIndividual 184
10 Laura BakerIndividual 176
11 Jac Smith GroupTeam 154
12 Traci BurnsIndividual 150
13 Gordon KlaiberIndividual 120
14 Judy HorvathIndividual 100
15 The Connors TeamTeam 98

Highest AI Visibility

AI Visibility Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameAI Visibility Score
1 The Kendall Bonner TeamTeam 46.4
2 Traci BurnsIndividual 41.8
3 Tampa Home GroupTeam 41.5
4 Liz HeinkelIndividual 41.4
5 Tillung Tampa BayTeam 40.6
6 Stephen HacheyIndividual 40.2
7 Laura BakerIndividual 40.1
8 Military Veteran TeamTeam 38.8
9 The Duncan Duo TeamTeam 37.5
10 The McIntosh GroupTeam 28.5
11 Ben Kinney Team - TampaTeam 28.1
12 Wade ClearyIndividual 27.8
13 Andreina SimmonsIndividual 27.5
14 Jac Smith GroupTeam 27.4
15 Sylvia HaddadIndividual 27.3
44 rows
NameTypeStatusConsumer authorityBandAI visibilityAI evidencePublic sales proofTransactionsReviewsProof links
Stephen Hachey Individual Source-backed directory 97.9 Market dominant 40.2 32 checks / 1 mentions 344 sales · $167.5M 344 316 Website · Production · Reviews
Traci Burns Individual Source-backed directory 91.0 Market dominant 41.8 32 checks / 2 mentions 45 sales · $53.6M 45 150 Website · Production · Reviews
The McIntosh Group Team Source-backed directory 88.2 Elite public proof 28.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 156 sales · $62.9M 156 359 Website · Production · Reviews
Tillung Tampa Bay Team Source-backed directory 86.6 Elite public proof 40.6 32 checks / 1 mentions 120 sales · $93.8M 120 290 Website · Production · Reviews
Wade Cleary Individual Source-backed directory 83.9 Elite public proof 27.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 35 sales · $15.5M 35 198 Website · Production · Reviews
Tampa Home Group Team Source-backed directory 83.7 Elite public proof 41.5 32 checks / 1 mentions 112 sales · $61.0M 112 620 Website · Production · Reviews
The Kendall Bonner Team Team Source-backed directory 83.3 Elite public proof 46.4 32 checks / 4 mentions 110 sales · $42.5M 110 771 Website · Production · Reviews
Lindsey Thibodeau Individual Source-backed directory 83.1 Elite public proof 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 44 sales · $17.4M 44 81 Website · Production · Reviews
Andreina Simmons Individual Source-backed directory 81.8 Elite public proof 27.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 31 sales · $23.9M 31 184 Website · Production · Reviews
Brooke Brate Individual Source-backed directory 81.0 Elite public proof 26.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 36 sales · $58.3M 36 66 Website · Production · Reviews
ANEW Collective Team Source-backed directory 78.6 Strong public proof 26.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 211 sales · $102.1M 211 80 Website · Production · Reviews
Military Veteran Team Team Source-backed directory 78.0 Strong public proof 38.8 32 checks / 1 mentions 1,352 sales · $474.7M 1,352 73 Website · Production · Reviews
Mary Kelly Individual Source-backed directory 76.6 Strong public proof 26.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 14 sales · $41.1M 14 65 Website · Production · Reviews
Sylvia Haddad Individual Source-backed directory 75.7 Strong public proof 27.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 29 sales · $16.6M 29 191 Website · Production · Reviews
Jac Smith Group Team Source-backed directory 74.7 Strong public proof 27.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 90 sales · $52.5M 90 154 Website · Production · Reviews
Laura Baker Individual Source-backed directory 74.6 Strong public proof 40.1 32 checks / 1 mentions 27 sales · $11.8M 27 176 Website · Production · Reviews
Jessica Beggins Houston Individual Source-backed directory 73.8 Strong public proof 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 37 sales · $15.7M 37 65 Website · Production · Reviews
Judy Horvath Individual Source-backed directory 72.0 Strong public proof 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 28 sales · $12.8M 28 100 Website · Production · Reviews
Todd Edwards Individual Source-backed directory 71.7 Strong public proof 26.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 42 sales · $38.0M 42 65 Website · Production · Reviews
Gordon Klaiber Individual Source-backed directory 70.8 Strong public proof 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 28 sales · $14.0M 28 120 Website · Production · Reviews
Dina Sierra Smith Individual Source-backed directory 70.7 Strong public proof 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 8 sales · $21.8M 8 74 Website · Production · Reviews
Liz Heinkel Individual Source-backed directory 67.8 Established public proof 41.4 32 checks / 3 mentions 52 sales · $124.3M 52 27 Website · Production · Reviews
The Duncan Duo Team Team Source-backed directory 67.8 Established public proof 37.5 32 checks / 1 mentions 252 sales · $114.2M 252 38 Website · Production · Reviews
Adam Kutchmire Individual Source-backed directory 66.5 Established public proof 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 20 sales · $22.7M 20 55 Website · Production · Reviews
Michelle Fitz-Randolph Individual Source-backed directory 66.4 Established public proof 25.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 22 sales · $40.1M 22 40 Website · Production · Reviews
iHomes Network Team Source-backed directory 64.7 Established public proof 26.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 147 sales · $70.0M 147 48 Website · Production · Reviews
Julie Kelsey Individual Source-backed directory 64.5 Established public proof 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 35 sales · $21.3M 35 47 Website · Production · Reviews
The Connors Team Team Source-backed directory 64.5 Established public proof 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 56 sales · $30.5M 56 98 Website · Production · Reviews
Amy Camasso Individual Source-backed directory 63.1 Established public proof 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 23 sales · $11.8M 23 70 Website · Production · Reviews
The Roman Group Team Source-backed directory 57.9 Source-backed candidate 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 98 sales · $39.5M 98 54 Website · Production · Reviews
Devan Weisser Individual Source-backed directory 57.7 Source-backed candidate 26.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 17 sales · $18.5M 17 58 Website · Production · Reviews
The Rutherford Group Team Source-backed directory 57.5 Source-backed candidate 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 88 sales · $39.6M 88 63 Website · Production · Reviews
Irwin Collective Team Source-backed directory 57.1 Source-backed candidate 26.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 40 sales · $23.8M 40 89 Website · Production · Reviews
The Jonesy Group Team Source-backed directory 56.6 Source-backed candidate 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 38 sales · $18.8M 38 92 Website · Production · Reviews
Kevin Freel Individual Source-backed directory 55.8 Source-backed candidate 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 22 sales · $15.1M 22 67 Website · Production · Reviews
DJ Soucy Group Team Source-backed directory 54.4 Source-backed candidate 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 45 sales · $28.7M 45 71 Website · Production · Reviews
Cody Calvo Individual Source-backed directory 53.8 Source-backed candidate 25.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 11 sales · $21.9M 11 25 Website · Production · Reviews
Ben Kinney Team - Tampa Team Source-backed directory 53.3 Source-backed candidate 28.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 29 sales · $11.4M 29 248 Website · Production · Reviews
Living Loving Team Team Source-backed directory 52.8 Source-backed candidate 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 40 sales · $18.6M 40 75 Website · Production · Reviews
Janice Rodriguez Individual Source-backed directory 46.0 Source-backed candidate 25.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 21 sales · $15.0M 21 36 Website · Production · Reviews
Rhea Shoop Individual Source-backed directory 39.9 Production proof captured 25.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 17 sales · $12.0M 17 32 Website · Production · Reviews
John Pestalozzi Jr. Individual Source-backed directory 38.7 Production proof captured 25.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 17 sales · $13.9M 17 28 Website · Production · Reviews
Mike + Michelle Team Team Source-backed directory 37.8 Production proof captured 25.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 31 sales · $18.0M 31 43 Website · Production · Reviews
Selling Tampa Bay Team Source-backed directory 32.4 Production proof captured 25.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 30 sales · $14.8M 30 33 Website · Production · Reviews