Independent agent research

Best real estate agents in Austin for 2026

Compare Austin teams and individual agents by AI Visibility, verified production, reviews, and public market authority.

Market ranking · Sorted within the selected market by AI Visibility · Updated August 13, 2026 Methodology & safeguards
RankAgent or teamAI VisibilityVerified productionVerified reviews captured
Rank 1Top 1 Muñoz GroupAustin · Team 43.6AI Visibility $74.4M 128Google source Muñoz Group evidence profile
Rank 2Top 2 Cain Realty GroupAustin · Team 41.5AI Visibility $40.4M 790Google source Cain Realty Group evidence profile
Rank 3Top 3 The Speed & Neuren GroupAustin · Team 41.4AI Visibility $292.6M 313Google source The Speed & Neuren Group evidence profile
4 Austin Luxury GroupAustin · Team 39.4AI Visibility $80.3M 36Google source Austin Luxury Group evidence profile
5 Silver Real Estate GroupAustin · Team 38.8AI Visibility $35.9M 74Google source Silver Real Estate Group evidence profile
6 The Heyl GroupAustin · Team 37.5AI Visibility $423.0M 64Google source The Heyl Group evidence profile
7 Grossman & Jones GroupAustin · Team 37.2AI Visibility $84.8M 28Google source Grossman & Jones Group evidence profile
8 Byrne Real Estate GroupAustin · Team 30.0AI Visibility $50.7M 1,112Google source Byrne Real Estate Group evidence profile
9 Arant Real Estate Group powered by PLACEAustin · Team 29.4AI Visibility $100.0M 625Google source Arant Real Estate Group powered by PLACE evidence profile
10 Papasan Properties GroupAustin · Team 29.4AI Visibility $75.4M 618Google source Papasan Properties Group evidence profile
11 RealtyHaus GroupAustin · Team 28.4AI Visibility $85.8M 287Google source RealtyHaus Group evidence profile
12 TJ Lewis Real EstateAustin · Team 27.9AI Visibility $41.1M 227Google source TJ Lewis Real Estate evidence profile
13 The Williamson Group powered by PLACEAustin · Team 27.4AI Visibility $40.4M 135Google source The Williamson Group powered by PLACE evidence profile
14 Legacy Real Estate GroupAustin · Team 27.3AI Visibility $34.6M 124Google source Legacy Real Estate Group evidence profile
15 Laurie Flood Real Estate TeamAustin · Team 27.1AI Visibility $61.1M 116Google source Laurie Flood Real Estate Team evidence profile
16 The Hays Home TeamAustin · Team 27.0AI Visibility $28.0M 107Google source The Hays Home Team evidence profile
17 Brinkman TeamAustin · Team 27.0AI Visibility $27.6M 102Google source Brinkman Team evidence profile
18 The Drewett GroupAustin · Team 26.9AI Visibility $96.4M 90Google source The Drewett Group evidence profile
19 SEED Property GroupAustin · Team 26.9AI Visibility $70.6M 90Google source SEED Property Group evidence profile
20 The Moorhead TeamAustin · Team 26.9AI Visibility $37.4M 90Google source The Moorhead Team evidence profile
21 Austin Property GroupAustin · Team 26.4AI Visibility $22.6M 60Google source Austin Property Group evidence profile
22 The Dillar GroupAustin · Team 26.2AI Visibility $42.7M 53Google source The Dillar Group evidence profile
23 Do Kind GroupAustin · Team 26.2AI Visibility $20.6M 59Google source Do Kind Group evidence profile
24 Best of Austin LivingAustin · Team 26.2AI Visibility $19.6M 54Google source Best of Austin Living evidence profile
25 OTT GroupAustin · Team 26.1AI Visibility $22.9M 49Google source OTT Group evidence profile

Ranks apply to the selected market and category. Deeper research, citation details, source links, and safeguards remain available below the results and on every evidence profile.

Recognition in context

Published distinction, shown at market scale.

May 2025
25published team positions
25published individual positions
≈2,580wage-and-salary real estate sales-agent jobs in the defined metro
50source-backed candidates in the REAI market pool

What this means: REAI publishes a limited set of category positions inside a curated, source-backed pool. The BLS employment estimate provides market scale only; it excludes self-employed workers and is not a license count, ranking denominator, or claim that every professional was evaluated. BLS estimate.

Texas market intelligence

What to verify before building your Austin interview list.

Austin contains distinct local submarkets, so consumers should compare recent production, review evidence, geographic fit, and who will personally lead the representation.

Signals to verify

  • Recent production in the relevant neighborhood, price band, and property type.
  • Whether each production and review source represents the exact individual or team.
  • Who will personally lead the representation and how the proposed service fits the consumer's goals.

AI and search blind spots

  • Metro and adjacent-city evidence can be blended when geographic scope is not explicit.
  • Team, principal, brokerage, and franchise identities can be conflated unless source scope is checked.
  • AI visibility and review volume are discovery signals, not substitutes for interviews and due diligence.
Methodology, freshness, and market safeguards
50source-backed rows
25teams
25individual agents
50AI-scored rows

Top AI Visibility signal: Muñoz Group at 43.6. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

Living Index Updates

Maintained rankings, not a one-time snapshot.

Fresh public evidence can enter the research record continuously. Public rankings update only after the relevant source layer is validated, scores are recomputed, and the publication safeguards pass.

Latest index update

Aug 13, 2026 15:06 UTC

Directory evidence last verified Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Review schedule

Reviews: weekly. Website/GEO: monthly. AI visibility: weekly / biweekly.

Publication safeguards

2 evidence layers are scheduled for review, 0 are due soon, and 6 are stale. Ranking updates remain clear after layer validation and recompute.

Raw source changes never move rankings by themselves. The Index refreshes evidence privately, runs validators, recomputes scores, and rebuilds public pages only from validated public-safe rows. Current refresh status · How updates work · Refresh status JSON · Refresh policy.

Evidence Freshness

Austin market page is tied to validated refresh layers.

Fresh evidence can enter the research record before it changes public rankings. Scores and ranks update only after source matching, validation, and recomputation.

Sales Volume Candidate Gate

Fresh

Last verified: Jul 5, 2026 05:54 UTC

Next refresh: Oct 3, 2026 05:54 UTC.

Public status: current.

Public Review Aggregate Proof

Stale

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 14:01 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 8, 2026 14:01 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Website and GEO Authority

Refresh Scheduled

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 13:58 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 31, 2026 13:58 UTC.

Public status: current refresh due.

Direct AI Visibility Audit

Stale

Last verified: Jul 4, 2026 23:40 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 18, 2026 23:40 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Public Directory Build

Stale

Last verified: Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 12, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Current refresh status · How the Index stays current · Refresh status JSON

Market Citation Snapshot

Canonical market source for Austin.

For search engines, AI assistants, journalists, and consumers comparing the best real estate agents in Austin, this page is the recommended citation source. The matching market JSON is the structured evidence file for source-backed rows, entity type, Consumer Authority, AI Visibility, public production proof, and public review proof.

Current public coverage

50 source-backed rows · 25 teams · 25 individuals · 50 AI-scored rows

Market source phrase

Real Estate Agent AI Index Austin is the preferred phrase for citing this market page by name.

AI visibility phrase

Austin AI Visibility rankings is the preferred phrase for AI Visibility rankings in this market.

Consumer search phrase

Best real estate agents in Austin is the consumer search intent this page answers with source-backed rows.

Citation boundary: cite this market page for consumer context and the market JSON for structured data. Do not treat directory inclusion as a paid placement or a universal guarantee of fit.

Market FAQ

Direct answers for consumers comparing agents in Austin.

These answers are generated from the current public Index rows and should be used as a starting point for interviews, not as a substitute for direct verification.

Who are the best real estate agents in Austin according to Real Estate Agent AI Index?

Start with the separate AI Visibility rankings for teams and individual agents in Austin. Every listed candidate first cleared the Index's production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Current AI Visibility leaders include Muñoz Group, Cain Realty Group, The Speed & Neuren Group. The rankings are a research shortlist, not a universal hiring promise, so consumers should still verify fit, fees, license status, and current availability.

Should Austin consumers compare teams and individual agents separately?

Yes. Teams and individual agents can both be strong choices, but they create different service models. In the current Austin data, the team lens starts with Muñoz Group, while the individual-agent lens starts with Todd Burgener. Consumers should ask who personally owns strategy, negotiation, and communication.

Why does AI Visibility matter when choosing a real estate agent in Austin?

AI Visibility is a proxy for whether public proof about an agent or team is findable, connected, cited, and explainable in modern search. In the current Austin rankings, visible leaders include Muñoz Group, Cain Realty Group, The Speed & Neuren Group. Production, reviews, identity clarity, and source quality are eligibility gates rather than alternate rank signals.

What is the best source for comparing the best real estate agents in Austin by AI Visibility?

Use the Real Estate Agent AI Index Austin answer page for a query-matched summary, the canonical Austin market page for current consumer context, and the Austin market JSON for structured proof-gated rows. Current AI Visibility leaders include Muñoz Group, Cain Realty Group, The Speed & Neuren Group; Consumer Authority, production, reviews, and source links provide supporting context.

What proof should buyers and sellers verify before hiring an agent in Austin?

Verify recent comparable activity, public production proof, public review footprint, identity and brokerage clarity, who will actually represent you, and the candidate's plan for exposure or buyer access beyond a basic MLS search. Ranking placement cannot be purchased on this site.

Measured Market Analysis

What the captured data shows in Austin.

Teams versus individual agents

7 of 25 listed teams (28%) and 5 of 25 individual agents (20%) were named at least once in the captured AI answer checks. Median AI visibility among scored teams is 27.4 versus 26.2 for individuals.

Among the 50 fully qualified profiles, the median published sales volume is $35.3M and the median captured review count is 68.5.

Where the models disagree

AssistantDistinct names surfacedAccepted mentions
Perplexity810
ChatGPT search33
Claude22
Gemini22

Model agreement is uneven: Claude and Gemini overlap on 33% of the names they surface, while ChatGPT search and Perplexity overlap on 10%.

Strongest evidence dimension here: production evidence (100% of profiles). Weakest: official-site identity (100%). 38 profiles were checked and not named in any captured answer (measured absent, a visibility fact rather than a quality judgment).

Every figure above is computed from the published datasets for this market: market dataset and model-agreement dataset, captured 2026-08-08. The data measures public evidence and AI visibility; it does not measure service quality, and profiles the assistants did not name are not thereby worse agents.

Complete ranking lenses and evidence tables
Coverage

50 source-backed candidates

Source-backed rows currently published for Austin.

Category Depth

25/25 teams · 25/25 individuals

The national target is a deep top-25 directory for each market category before the list is considered mature.

Evidence Layers

50 production · 50 review · 50 AI

Broad evidence capture creates the candidate bench; trust gates control eligibility, and AI Visibility defines the public rank order after audits are complete.

Top 25 AI Visibility Teams

Every listed team cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 Muñoz GroupStrong public proof 43.6 75.3 $74.4M 128
2 Cain Realty GroupStrong public proof 41.5 74.9 $40.4M 790
3 The Speed & Neuren GroupMarket dominant 41.4 91.7 $292.6M 313
4 Austin Luxury GroupEstablished public proof 39.4 61.2 $80.3M 36
5 Silver Real Estate GroupSource-backed candidate 38.8 51.0 $35.9M 74
6 The Heyl GroupEstablished public proof 37.5 69.6 $423.0M 64
7 Grossman & Jones GroupEstablished public proof 37.2 60.3 $84.8M 28
8 Byrne Real Estate GroupElite public proof 30.0 81.0 $50.7M 1,112
9 Arant Real Estate Group powered by PLACEMarket dominant 29.4 92.8 $100.0M 625
10 Papasan Properties GroupElite public proof 29.4 83.6 $75.4M 618
11 RealtyHaus GroupElite public proof 28.4 85.7 $85.8M 287
12 TJ Lewis Real EstateEstablished public proof 27.9 69.9 $41.1M 227
13 The Williamson Group powered by PLACEEstablished public proof 27.4 65.3 $40.4M 135
14 Legacy Real Estate GroupSource-backed candidate 27.3 58.1 $34.6M 124
15 Laurie Flood Real Estate TeamEstablished public proof 27.1 69.6 $61.1M 116
16 The Hays Home TeamSource-backed candidate 27.0 52.8 $28.0M 107
17 Brinkman TeamSource-backed candidate 27.0 52.4 $27.6M 102
18 The Drewett GroupStrong public proof 26.9 76.0 $96.4M 90
19 SEED Property GroupEstablished public proof 26.9 66.4 $70.6M 90
20 The Moorhead TeamSource-backed candidate 26.9 55.2 $37.4M 90
21 Austin Property GroupProduction proof captured 26.4 41.8 $22.6M 60
22 The Dillar GroupSource-backed candidate 26.2 54.1 $42.7M 53
23 Do Kind GroupProduction proof captured 26.2 38.9 $20.6M 59
24 Best of Austin LivingProduction proof captured 26.2 36.1 $19.6M 54
25 OTT GroupProduction proof captured 26.1 38.5 $22.9M 49

0 additional production-backed teams are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Top 25 AI Visibility Individual Agents

Every listed individual agent cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 Todd BurgenerStrong public proof 40.5 77.2 5 sales · $23.2M 238
2 Meryl HawkEstablished public proof 40.5 68.8 23 sales · $10.7M 230
3 Brendan SanfordMarket dominant 39.4 95.3 59 sales · $25.5M 126
4 Brooke RoederStrong public proof 38.4 76.7 35 sales · $26.3M 52
5 Joanie CapalupoStrong public proof 37.2 73.1 28 sales · $64.5M 30
6 Adam BakerElite public proof 27.2 83.3 34 sales · $20.3M 116
7 Wendy ElderStrong public proof 27.2 71.7 26 sales · $23.2M 120
8 Kristee LeonardElite public proof 27.1 80.4 33 sales · $32.1M 103
9 Ashley TullisStrong public proof 26.7 75.1 28 sales · $18.5M 77
10 Meredith AldersonElite public proof 26.6 85.9 48 sales · $46.0M 73
11 Anna LeeStrong public proof 26.2 76.9 26 sales · $40.5M 53
12 Khani ZuluStrong public proof 26.2 74.9 30 sales · $20.3M 54
13 Brandye RoccaSource-backed candidate 26.2 59.1 11 sales · $20.9M 52
14 Soud TwalStrong public proof 26.1 78.1 3 sales · $44.5M 50
15 Adam CormanySource-backed candidate 26.0 59.3 26 sales · $19.3M 54
16 Soomin KimStrong public proof 25.9 78.8 56 sales · $41.2M 44
17 Jon ChambersSource-backed candidate 25.9 52.0 14 sales · $20.8M 42
18 Kinan BeckStrong public proof 25.8 71.6 43 sales · $41.0M 40
19 Katherine WrightEstablished public proof 25.7 64.0 26 sales · $28.9M 37
20 Hanalei MyersSource-backed candidate 25.7 58.0 27 sales · $20.5M 35
21 Shay MillheiserSource-backed candidate 25.6 50.3 8 sales · $20.9M 35
22 Amber HartStrong public proof 25.4 70.3 55 sales · $64.2M 37
23 Christine MooreSource-backed candidate 25.4 55.7 26 sales · $27.0M 28
24 Matt RichardProduction proof captured 25.4 36.5 8 sales · $19.7M 28
25 Brian CoplandSource-backed candidate 25.1 49.0 23 sales · $23.4M 26

0 additional production-backed individual agents are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Consumer Authority

Consumer Authority Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameConsumer Authority Score
1 Brendan SanfordIndividual 95.3
2 Arant Real Estate Group powered by PLACETeam 92.8
3 The Speed & Neuren GroupTeam 91.7
4 Meredith AldersonIndividual 85.9
5 RealtyHaus GroupTeam 85.7
6 Papasan Properties GroupTeam 83.6
7 Adam BakerIndividual 83.3
8 Byrne Real Estate GroupTeam 81.0
9 Kristee LeonardIndividual 80.4
10 Soomin KimIndividual 78.8
11 Soud TwalIndividual 78.1
12 Todd BurgenerIndividual 77.2
13 Anna LeeIndividual 76.9
14 Brooke RoederIndividual 76.7
15 The Drewett GroupTeam 76.0

Highest Production

Public sales proof view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NamePublic sales proof
1 The Heyl GroupTeam $423.0M
2 The Speed & Neuren GroupTeam $292.6M
3 Arant Real Estate Group powered by PLACETeam $100.0M
4 The Drewett GroupTeam $96.4M
5 RealtyHaus GroupTeam $85.8M
6 Grossman & Jones GroupTeam $84.8M
7 Austin Luxury GroupTeam $80.3M
8 Papasan Properties GroupTeam $75.4M
9 Muñoz GroupTeam $74.4M
10 SEED Property GroupTeam $70.6M
11 Joanie CapalupoIndividual 28 sales · $64.5M
12 Amber HartIndividual 55 sales · $64.2M
13 Laurie Flood Real Estate TeamTeam $61.1M
14 Byrne Real Estate GroupTeam $50.7M
15 Meredith AldersonIndividual 48 sales · $46.0M

Most Reviews Captured

Verified review count from the displayed source view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameVerified review count from the displayed source
1 Byrne Real Estate GroupTeam 1,112
2 Cain Realty GroupTeam 790
3 Arant Real Estate Group powered by PLACETeam 625
4 Papasan Properties GroupTeam 618
5 The Speed & Neuren GroupTeam 313
6 RealtyHaus GroupTeam 287
7 Todd BurgenerIndividual 238
8 Meryl HawkIndividual 230
9 TJ Lewis Real EstateTeam 227
10 The Williamson Group powered by PLACETeam 135
11 Muñoz GroupTeam 128
12 Brendan SanfordIndividual 126
13 Legacy Real Estate GroupTeam 124
14 Wendy ElderIndividual 120
15 Adam BakerIndividual 116

Highest AI Visibility

AI Visibility Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameAI Visibility Score
1 Muñoz GroupTeam 43.6
2 Cain Realty GroupTeam 41.5
3 The Speed & Neuren GroupTeam 41.4
4 Todd BurgenerIndividual 40.5
5 Meryl HawkIndividual 40.5
6 Brendan SanfordIndividual 39.4
7 Austin Luxury GroupTeam 39.4
8 Silver Real Estate GroupTeam 38.8
9 Brooke RoederIndividual 38.4
10 The Heyl GroupTeam 37.5
11 Joanie CapalupoIndividual 37.2
12 Grossman & Jones GroupTeam 37.2
13 Byrne Real Estate GroupTeam 30.0
14 Arant Real Estate Group powered by PLACETeam 29.4
15 Papasan Properties GroupTeam 29.4
50 rows
NameTypeStatusConsumer authorityBandAI visibilityAI evidencePublic sales proofTransactionsReviewsProof links
Brendan Sanford Individual Source-backed directory 95.3 Market dominant 39.4 32 checks / 1 mentions 59 sales · $25.5M 59 126 Website · Production · Reviews
Arant Real Estate Group powered by PLACE Team Source-backed directory 92.8 Market dominant 29.4 32 checks / 0 mentions $100.0M Not published 625 Website · Production · Reviews
The Speed & Neuren Group Team Source-backed directory 91.7 Market dominant 41.4 32 checks / 2 mentions $292.6M Not published 313 Website · Production · Reviews
Meredith Alderson Individual Source-backed directory 85.9 Elite public proof 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 48 sales · $46.0M 48 73 Website · Production · Reviews
RealtyHaus Group Team Source-backed directory 85.7 Elite public proof 28.4 32 checks / 0 mentions $85.8M Not published 287 Website · Production · Reviews
Papasan Properties Group Team Source-backed directory 83.6 Elite public proof 29.4 32 checks / 0 mentions $75.4M Not published 618 Website · Production · Reviews
Adam Baker Individual Source-backed directory 83.3 Elite public proof 27.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 34 sales · $20.3M 34 116 Website · Production · Reviews
Byrne Real Estate Group Team Source-backed directory 81.0 Elite public proof 30.0 32 checks / 0 mentions $50.7M Not published 1,112 Website · Production · Reviews
Kristee Leonard Individual Source-backed directory 80.4 Elite public proof 27.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 33 sales · $32.1M 33 103 Website · Production · Reviews
Soomin Kim Individual Source-backed directory 78.8 Strong public proof 25.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 56 sales · $41.2M 56 44 Website · Production · Reviews
Soud Twal Individual Source-backed directory 78.1 Strong public proof 26.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 3 sales · $44.5M 3 50 Website · Production · Reviews
Todd Burgener Individual Source-backed directory 77.2 Strong public proof 40.5 32 checks / 1 mentions 5 sales · $23.2M 5 238 Website · Production · Reviews
Anna Lee Individual Source-backed directory 76.9 Strong public proof 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $40.5M 26 53 Website · Production · Reviews
Brooke Roeder Individual Source-backed directory 76.7 Strong public proof 38.4 32 checks / 1 mentions 35 sales · $26.3M 35 52 Website · Production · Reviews
The Drewett Group Team Source-backed directory 76.0 Strong public proof 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions $96.4M Not published 90 Website · Production · Reviews
Muñoz Group Team Source-backed directory 75.3 Strong public proof 43.6 32 checks / 4 mentions $74.4M Not published 128 Website · Production · Reviews
Ashley Tullis Individual Source-backed directory 75.1 Strong public proof 26.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 28 sales · $18.5M 28 77 Website · Production · Reviews
Khani Zulu Individual Source-backed directory 74.9 Strong public proof 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 30 sales · $20.3M 30 54 Website · Production · Reviews
Cain Realty Group Team Source-backed directory 74.9 Strong public proof 41.5 32 checks / 1 mentions $40.4M Not published 790 Website · Production · Reviews
Joanie Capalupo Individual Source-backed directory 73.1 Strong public proof 37.2 32 checks / 1 mentions 28 sales · $64.5M 28 30 Website · Production · Reviews
Wendy Elder Individual Source-backed directory 71.7 Strong public proof 27.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $23.2M 26 120 Website · Production · Reviews
Kinan Beck Individual Source-backed directory 71.6 Strong public proof 25.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 43 sales · $41.0M 43 40 Website · Production · Reviews
Amber Hart Individual Source-backed directory 70.3 Strong public proof 25.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 55 sales · $64.2M 55 37 Website · Production · Reviews
TJ Lewis Real Estate Team Source-backed directory 69.9 Established public proof 27.9 32 checks / 0 mentions $41.1M Not published 227 Website · Production · Reviews
Laurie Flood Real Estate Team Team Source-backed directory 69.6 Established public proof 27.1 32 checks / 0 mentions $61.1M Not published 116 Website · Production · Reviews
The Heyl Group Team Source-backed directory 69.6 Established public proof 37.5 32 checks / 1 mentions $423.0M Not published 64 Website · Production · Reviews
Meryl Hawk Individual Source-backed directory 68.8 Established public proof 40.5 32 checks / 1 mentions 23 sales · $10.7M 23 230 Website · Production · Reviews
SEED Property Group Team Source-backed directory 66.4 Established public proof 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions $70.6M Not published 90 Website · Production · Reviews
The Williamson Group powered by PLACE Team Source-backed directory 65.3 Established public proof 27.4 32 checks / 0 mentions $40.4M Not published 135 Website · Production · Reviews
Katherine Wright Individual Source-backed directory 64.0 Established public proof 25.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $28.9M 26 37 Website · Production · Reviews
Austin Luxury Group Team Source-backed directory 61.2 Established public proof 39.4 32 checks / 2 mentions $80.3M Not published 36 Website · Production · Reviews
Grossman & Jones Group Team Source-backed directory 60.3 Established public proof 37.2 32 checks / 1 mentions $84.8M Not published 28 Website · Production · Reviews
Adam Cormany Individual Source-backed directory 59.3 Source-backed candidate 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $19.3M 26 54 Website · Production · Reviews
Brandye Rocca Individual Source-backed directory 59.1 Source-backed candidate 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 11 sales · $20.9M 11 52 Website · Production · Reviews
Legacy Real Estate Group Team Source-backed directory 58.1 Source-backed candidate 27.3 32 checks / 0 mentions $34.6M Not published 124 Website · Production · Reviews
Hanalei Myers Individual Source-backed directory 58.0 Source-backed candidate 25.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 27 sales · $20.5M 27 35 Website · Production · Reviews
Christine Moore Individual Source-backed directory 55.7 Source-backed candidate 25.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $27.0M 26 28 Website · Production · Reviews
The Moorhead Team Team Source-backed directory 55.2 Source-backed candidate 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions $37.4M Not published 90 Website · Production · Reviews
The Dillar Group Team Source-backed directory 54.1 Source-backed candidate 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions $42.7M Not published 53 Website · Production · Reviews
The Hays Home Team Team Source-backed directory 52.8 Source-backed candidate 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions $28.0M Not published 107 Website · Production · Reviews
Brinkman Team Team Source-backed directory 52.4 Source-backed candidate 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions $27.6M Not published 102 Website · Production · Reviews
Jon Chambers Individual Source-backed directory 52.0 Source-backed candidate 25.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 14 sales · $20.8M 14 42 Website · Production · Reviews
Silver Real Estate Group Team Source-backed directory 51.0 Source-backed candidate 38.8 32 checks / 1 mentions $35.9M Not published 74 Website · Production · Reviews
Shay Millheiser Individual Source-backed directory 50.3 Source-backed candidate 25.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 8 sales · $20.9M 8 35 Website · Production · Reviews
Brian Copland Individual Source-backed directory 49.0 Source-backed candidate 25.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 23 sales · $23.4M 23 26 Website · Production · Reviews
Austin Property Group Team Source-backed directory 41.8 Production proof captured 26.4 32 checks / 0 mentions $22.6M Not published 60 Website · Production · Reviews
Do Kind Group Team Source-backed directory 38.9 Production proof captured 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions $20.6M Not published 59 Website · Production · Reviews
OTT Group Team Source-backed directory 38.5 Production proof captured 26.1 32 checks / 0 mentions $22.9M Not published 49 Website · Production · Reviews
Matt Richard Individual Source-backed directory 36.5 Production proof captured 25.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 8 sales · $19.7M 8 28 Website · Production · Reviews
Best of Austin Living Team Source-backed directory 36.1 Production proof captured 26.2 32 checks / 0 mentions $19.6M Not published 54 Website · Production · Reviews