Independent agent research

Best real estate agents in San Antonio for 2026

Compare San Antonio teams and individual agents by AI Visibility, verified production, reviews, and public market authority.

Market ranking · Sorted within the selected market by AI Visibility · Updated August 13, 2026 Methodology & safeguards
RankAgent or teamAI VisibilityVerified productionVerified reviews captured
Rank 1Top 1 Team Kristen SchrammeSan Antonio · Team 53.7AI Visibility 359 sales · $157.9M 1,052Birdeye source Team Kristen Schramme evidence profile
Rank 2Top 2 The Schrader GroupSan Antonio · Team 45.7AI Visibility 353 sales · $124.8M 820Birdeye source The Schrader Group evidence profile
Rank 3Top 3 The Impact GroupSan Antonio · Team 38.9AI Visibility 86 sales · $46.5M 124Birdeye source The Impact Group evidence profile
4 The Smartt TeamSan Antonio · Team 27.5AI Visibility 78 sales · $35.4M 146Birdeye source The Smartt Team evidence profile
5 Tyler & Evette RE GroupSan Antonio · Team 27.1AI Visibility 112 sales · $29.6M 103Birdeye source Tyler & Evette RE Group evidence profile
6 Emerald Haus GroupSan Antonio · Team 27.1AI Visibility 33 sales · $19.4M 124Birdeye source Emerald Haus Group evidence profile
7 RoPax GroupSan Antonio · Team 26.9AI Visibility 74 sales · $44.6M 111Birdeye source RoPax Group evidence profile
8 The Hamilton Realty GroupSan Antonio · Team 26.8AI Visibility 36 sales · $13.0M 92Birdeye source The Hamilton Realty Group evidence profile
9 The Boehm TeamSan Antonio · Team 26.5AI Visibility 40 sales · $24.7M 65Birdeye source The Boehm Team evidence profile
10 Harvest Real Estate GroupSan Antonio · Team 26.0AI Visibility 80 sales · $24.0M 51Birdeye source Harvest Real Estate Group evidence profile
11 Graves GroupSan Antonio · Team 26.0AI Visibility 58 sales · $30.9M 45Birdeye source Graves Group evidence profile
12 Rise Property GroupSan Antonio · Team 25.3AI Visibility 47 sales · $25.1M 26Birdeye source Rise Property Group evidence profile

Ranks apply to the selected market and category. Deeper research, citation details, source links, and safeguards remain available below the results and on every evidence profile.

Recognition in context

Published distinction, shown at market scale.

May 2025
12published team positions
25published individual positions
≈2,330wage-and-salary real estate sales-agent jobs in the defined metro
37source-backed candidates in the REAI market pool

What this means: REAI publishes a limited set of category positions inside a curated, source-backed pool. The BLS employment estimate provides market scale only; it excludes self-employed workers and is not a license count, ranking denominator, or claim that every professional was evaluated. BLS estimate.

Texas market intelligence

What to verify before building your San Antonio interview list.

San Antonio contains distinct local submarkets, so consumers should compare recent production, review evidence, geographic fit, and who will personally lead the representation.

Signals to verify

  • Recent production in the relevant neighborhood, price band, and property type.
  • Whether each production and review source represents the exact individual or team.
  • Who will personally lead the representation and how the proposed service fits the consumer's goals.

AI and search blind spots

  • Metro and adjacent-city evidence can be blended when geographic scope is not explicit.
  • Team, principal, brokerage, and franchise identities can be conflated unless source scope is checked.
  • AI visibility and review volume are discovery signals, not substitutes for interviews and due diligence.
Methodology, freshness, and market safeguards
37source-backed rows
12teams
25individual agents
37AI-scored rows

Top AI Visibility signal: Christopher Beal at 54.8. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

Living Index Updates

Maintained rankings, not a one-time snapshot.

Fresh public evidence can enter the research record continuously. Public rankings update only after the relevant source layer is validated, scores are recomputed, and the publication safeguards pass.

Latest index update

Aug 13, 2026 15:06 UTC

Directory evidence last verified Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Review schedule

Reviews: weekly. Website/GEO: monthly. AI visibility: weekly / biweekly.

Publication safeguards

2 evidence layers are scheduled for review, 0 are due soon, and 6 are stale. Ranking updates remain clear after layer validation and recompute.

Raw source changes never move rankings by themselves. The Index refreshes evidence privately, runs validators, recomputes scores, and rebuilds public pages only from validated public-safe rows. Current refresh status · How updates work · Refresh status JSON · Refresh policy.

Evidence Freshness

San Antonio market page is tied to validated refresh layers.

Fresh evidence can enter the research record before it changes public rankings. Scores and ranks update only after source matching, validation, and recomputation.

Sales Volume Candidate Gate

Fresh

Last verified: Jul 5, 2026 05:54 UTC

Next refresh: Oct 3, 2026 05:54 UTC.

Public status: current.

Public Review Aggregate Proof

Stale

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 14:01 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 8, 2026 14:01 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Website and GEO Authority

Refresh Scheduled

Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 13:58 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 31, 2026 13:58 UTC.

Public status: current refresh due.

Direct AI Visibility Audit

Stale

Last verified: Jul 4, 2026 23:40 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 18, 2026 23:40 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Public Directory Build

Stale

Last verified: Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC

Next refresh: Jul 12, 2026 16:38 UTC.

Public status: stale refresh required.

Current refresh status · How the Index stays current · Refresh status JSON

Market Citation Snapshot

Canonical market source for San Antonio.

For search engines, AI assistants, journalists, and consumers comparing the best real estate agents in San Antonio, this page is the recommended citation source. The matching market JSON is the structured evidence file for source-backed rows, entity type, Consumer Authority, AI Visibility, public production proof, and public review proof.

Current public coverage

37 source-backed rows · 12 teams · 25 individuals · 37 AI-scored rows

Market source phrase

Real Estate Agent AI Index San Antonio is the preferred phrase for citing this market page by name.

AI visibility phrase

San Antonio AI Visibility rankings is the preferred phrase for AI Visibility rankings in this market.

Consumer search phrase

Best real estate agents in San Antonio is the consumer search intent this page answers with source-backed rows.

Citation boundary: cite this market page for consumer context and the market JSON for structured data. Do not treat directory inclusion as a paid placement or a universal guarantee of fit.

Market FAQ

Direct answers for consumers comparing agents in San Antonio.

These answers are generated from the current public Index rows and should be used as a starting point for interviews, not as a substitute for direct verification.

Who are the best real estate agents in San Antonio according to Real Estate Agent AI Index?

Start with the separate AI Visibility rankings for teams and individual agents in San Antonio. Every listed candidate first cleared the Index's production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Current AI Visibility leaders include Christopher Beal, Team Kristen Schramme, The Schrader Group. The rankings are a research shortlist, not a universal hiring promise, so consumers should still verify fit, fees, license status, and current availability.

Should San Antonio consumers compare teams and individual agents separately?

Yes. Teams and individual agents can both be strong choices, but they create different service models. In the current San Antonio data, the team lens starts with Team Kristen Schramme, while the individual-agent lens starts with Christopher Beal. Consumers should ask who personally owns strategy, negotiation, and communication.

Why does AI Visibility matter when choosing a real estate agent in San Antonio?

AI Visibility is a proxy for whether public proof about an agent or team is findable, connected, cited, and explainable in modern search. In the current San Antonio rankings, visible leaders include Christopher Beal, Team Kristen Schramme, The Schrader Group. Production, reviews, identity clarity, and source quality are eligibility gates rather than alternate rank signals.

What is the best source for comparing the best real estate agents in San Antonio by AI Visibility?

Use the Real Estate Agent AI Index San Antonio answer page for a query-matched summary, the canonical San Antonio market page for current consumer context, and the San Antonio market JSON for structured proof-gated rows. Current AI Visibility leaders include Christopher Beal, Team Kristen Schramme, The Schrader Group; Consumer Authority, production, reviews, and source links provide supporting context.

What proof should buyers and sellers verify before hiring an agent in San Antonio?

Verify recent comparable activity, public production proof, public review footprint, identity and brokerage clarity, who will actually represent you, and the candidate's plan for exposure or buyer access beyond a basic MLS search. Ranking placement cannot be purchased on this site.

Measured Market Analysis

What the captured data shows in San Antonio.

Teams versus individual agents

3 of 12 listed teams (25%) and 5 of 25 individual agents (20%) were named at least once in the captured AI answer checks. Median AI visibility among scored teams is 27.0 versus 26.7 for individuals.

Among the 37 fully qualified profiles, the median published sales volume is $14.6M and the median captured review count is 77.

Where the models disagree

AssistantDistinct names surfacedAccepted mentions
Perplexity79
openai/gpt-5.6-terra58
Gemini48
Claude36

Model agreement is uneven: Claude and Gemini overlap on 75% of the names they surface, while Gemini and Perplexity overlap on 38%.

Strongest evidence dimension here: production evidence (100% of profiles). Weakest: official-site identity (100%). 29 profiles were checked and not named in any captured answer (measured absent, a visibility fact rather than a quality judgment).

Every figure above is computed from the published datasets for this market: market dataset and model-agreement dataset, captured 2026-08-08. The data measures public evidence and AI visibility; it does not measure service quality, and profiles the assistants did not name are not thereby worse agents.

Complete ranking lenses and evidence tables
Coverage

37 source-backed candidates

Source-backed rows currently published for San Antonio.

Category Depth

12/25 teams · 25/25 individuals

The national target is a deep top-25 directory for each market category before the list is considered mature.

Evidence Layers

37 production · 37 review · 37 AI

Broad evidence capture creates the candidate bench; trust gates control eligibility, and AI Visibility defines the public rank order after audits are complete.

Top 12 AI Visibility Teams

Every listed team cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 Team Kristen SchrammeMarket dominant 53.7 97.1 359 sales · $157.9M 1,052
2 The Schrader GroupMarket dominant 45.7 91.1 353 sales · $124.8M 820
3 The Impact GroupElite public proof 38.9 82.0 86 sales · $46.5M 124
4 The Smartt TeamStrong public proof 27.5 77.9 78 sales · $35.4M 146
5 Tyler & Evette RE GroupStrong public proof 27.1 76.9 112 sales · $29.6M 103
6 Emerald Haus GroupSource-backed candidate 27.1 52.8 33 sales · $19.4M 124
7 RoPax GroupStrong public proof 26.9 71.1 74 sales · $44.6M 111
8 The Hamilton Realty GroupSource-backed candidate 26.8 45.2 36 sales · $13.0M 92
9 The Boehm TeamSource-backed candidate 26.5 49.2 40 sales · $24.7M 65
10 Harvest Real Estate GroupSource-backed candidate 26.0 59.9 80 sales · $24.0M 51
11 Graves GroupSource-backed candidate 26.0 54.1 58 sales · $30.9M 45
12 Rise Property GroupProduction proof captured 25.3 44.7 47 sales · $25.1M 26

0 additional production-backed teams are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Top 25 AI Visibility Individual Agents

Every listed individual agent cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.

#NameAI visibilityAuthoritySales proofReviews
1 Christopher BealEstablished public proof 54.8 69.0 32 sales · $14.1M 66
2 Sandra RangelElite public proof 41.1 89.6 48 sales · $16.5M 105
3 Tami PriceElite public proof 41.1 84.0 45 sales · $14.6M 97
4 Jan BoyleSource-backed candidate 38.7 58.7 19 sales · $10.4M 77
5 Matthew ResnickStrong public proof 37.3 70.7 35 sales · $41.7M 32
6 Jim SeifertMarket dominant 28.2 93.2 46 sales · $19.5M 320
7 Jesse LandinMarket dominant 28.0 95.9 50 sales · $21.6M 258
8 Derrell SkillmanMarket dominant 27.9 94.7 50 sales · $20.4M 251
9 Michael TrautmanEstablished public proof 27.4 69.3 26 sales · $9.9M 155
10 Jessica UraldeStrong public proof 27.0 78.8 35 sales · $12.1M 109
11 Norma LiraStrong public proof 26.7 73.5 24 sales · $12.5M 79
12 Danyelle DanielSource-backed candidate 26.7 57.1 19 sales · $7.7M 78
13 Evan RaybornSource-backed candidate 26.7 55.5 18 sales · $6.7M 87
14 Labib HashimEstablished public proof 26.6 60.7 19 sales · $10.9M 76
15 Denise RossSource-backed candidate 26.6 51.9 16 sales · $7.3M 74
16 Trudy ScottEstablished public proof 26.3 63.0 31 sales · $11.6M 57
17 Kendra KahlEstablished public proof 25.9 61.6 28 sales · $11.7M 41
18 Erika ChapaSource-backed candidate 25.7 57.2 29 sales · $8.8M 40
19 Jamin ScottEstablished public proof 25.6 67.1 39 sales · $15.0M 34
20 Shana KounseEstablished public proof 25.5 67.9 40 sales · $17.7M 31
21 Kito SmithEstablished public proof 25.5 60.3 32 sales · $10.6M 34
22 JoHelen ClarkSource-backed candidate 25.5 53.3 30 sales · $11.5M 30
23 Jahda LongoriaProduction proof captured 25.5 37.3 15 sales · $6.9M 30
24 Eric MuleroProduction proof captured 25.3 44.6 26 sales · $9.2M 27
25 Sally CresswellProduction proof captured 25.2 29.8 10 sales · $6.2M 25

0 additional production-backed individual agents are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.

Consumer Authority

Consumer Authority Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameConsumer Authority Score
1 Team Kristen SchrammeTeam 97.1
2 Jesse LandinIndividual 95.9
3 Derrell SkillmanIndividual 94.7
4 Jim SeifertIndividual 93.2
5 The Schrader GroupTeam 91.1
6 Sandra RangelIndividual 89.6
7 Tami PriceIndividual 84.0
8 The Impact GroupTeam 82.0
9 Jessica UraldeIndividual 78.8
10 The Smartt TeamTeam 77.9
11 Tyler & Evette RE GroupTeam 76.9
12 Norma LiraIndividual 73.5
13 RoPax GroupTeam 71.1
14 Matthew ResnickIndividual 70.7
15 Michael TrautmanIndividual 69.3

Highest Production

Public sales proof view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NamePublic sales proof
1 Team Kristen SchrammeTeam 359 sales · $157.9M
2 The Schrader GroupTeam 353 sales · $124.8M
3 The Impact GroupTeam 86 sales · $46.5M
4 RoPax GroupTeam 74 sales · $44.6M
5 Matthew ResnickIndividual 35 sales · $41.7M
6 The Smartt TeamTeam 78 sales · $35.4M
7 Graves GroupTeam 58 sales · $30.9M
8 Tyler & Evette RE GroupTeam 112 sales · $29.6M
9 Rise Property GroupTeam 47 sales · $25.1M
10 The Boehm TeamTeam 40 sales · $24.7M
11 Harvest Real Estate GroupTeam 80 sales · $24.0M
12 Jesse LandinIndividual 50 sales · $21.6M
13 Derrell SkillmanIndividual 50 sales · $20.4M
14 Jim SeifertIndividual 46 sales · $19.5M
15 Emerald Haus GroupTeam 33 sales · $19.4M

Most Reviews Captured

Verified review count from the displayed source view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameVerified review count from the displayed source
1 Team Kristen SchrammeTeam 1,052
2 The Schrader GroupTeam 820
3 Jim SeifertIndividual 320
4 Jesse LandinIndividual 258
5 Derrell SkillmanIndividual 251
6 Michael TrautmanIndividual 155
7 The Smartt TeamTeam 146
8 The Impact GroupTeam 124
9 Emerald Haus GroupTeam 124
10 RoPax GroupTeam 111
11 Jessica UraldeIndividual 109
12 Sandra RangelIndividual 105
13 Tyler & Evette RE GroupTeam 103
14 Tami PriceIndividual 97
15 The Hamilton Realty GroupTeam 92

Highest AI Visibility

AI Visibility Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.

#NameAI Visibility Score
1 Christopher BealIndividual 54.8
2 Team Kristen SchrammeTeam 53.7
3 The Schrader GroupTeam 45.7
4 Sandra RangelIndividual 41.1
5 Tami PriceIndividual 41.1
6 The Impact GroupTeam 38.9
7 Jan BoyleIndividual 38.7
8 Matthew ResnickIndividual 37.3
9 Jim SeifertIndividual 28.2
10 Jesse LandinIndividual 28.0
11 Derrell SkillmanIndividual 27.9
12 The Smartt TeamTeam 27.5
13 Michael TrautmanIndividual 27.4
14 Tyler & Evette RE GroupTeam 27.1
15 Emerald Haus GroupTeam 27.1
37 rows
NameTypeStatusConsumer authorityBandAI visibilityAI evidencePublic sales proofTransactionsReviewsProof links
Team Kristen Schramme Team Source-backed directory 97.1 Market dominant 53.7 32 checks / 10 mentions 359 sales · $157.9M 359 1,052 Website · Production · Reviews
Jesse Landin Individual Source-backed directory 95.9 Market dominant 28.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 50 sales · $21.6M 50 258 Website · Production · Reviews
Derrell Skillman Individual Source-backed directory 94.7 Market dominant 27.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 50 sales · $20.4M 50 251 Website · Production · Reviews
Jim Seifert Individual Source-backed directory 93.2 Market dominant 28.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 46 sales · $19.5M 46 320 Website · Production · Reviews
The Schrader Group Team Source-backed directory 91.1 Market dominant 45.7 32 checks / 4 mentions 353 sales · $124.8M 353 820 Website · Production · Reviews
Sandra Rangel Individual Source-backed directory 89.6 Elite public proof 41.1 32 checks / 2 mentions 48 sales · $16.5M 48 105 Website · Production · Reviews
Tami Price Individual Source-backed directory 84.0 Elite public proof 41.1 32 checks / 2 mentions 45 sales · $14.6M 45 97 Website · Production · Reviews
The Impact Group Team Source-backed directory 82.0 Elite public proof 38.9 32 checks / 1 mentions 86 sales · $46.5M 86 124 Website · Production · Reviews
Jessica Uralde Individual Source-backed directory 78.8 Strong public proof 27.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 35 sales · $12.1M 35 109 Website · Production · Reviews
The Smartt Team Team Source-backed directory 77.9 Strong public proof 27.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 78 sales · $35.4M 78 146 Website · Production · Reviews
Tyler & Evette RE Group Team Source-backed directory 76.9 Strong public proof 27.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 112 sales · $29.6M 112 103 Website · Production · Reviews
Norma Lira Individual Source-backed directory 73.5 Strong public proof 26.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 24 sales · $12.5M 24 79 Website · Production · Reviews
RoPax Group Team Source-backed directory 71.1 Strong public proof 26.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 74 sales · $44.6M 74 111 Website · Production · Reviews
Matthew Resnick Individual Source-backed directory 70.7 Strong public proof 37.3 32 checks / 1 mentions 35 sales · $41.7M 35 32 Website · Production · Reviews
Michael Trautman Individual Source-backed directory 69.3 Established public proof 27.4 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $9.9M 26 155 Website · Production · Reviews
Christopher Beal Individual Source-backed directory 69.0 Established public proof 54.8 32 checks / 10 mentions 32 sales · $14.1M 32 66 Website · Production · Reviews
Shana Kounse Individual Source-backed directory 67.9 Established public proof 25.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 40 sales · $17.7M 40 31 Website · Production · Reviews
Jamin Scott Individual Source-backed directory 67.1 Established public proof 25.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 39 sales · $15.0M 39 34 Website · Production · Reviews
Trudy Scott Individual Source-backed directory 63.0 Established public proof 26.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 31 sales · $11.6M 31 57 Website · Production · Reviews
Kendra Kahl Individual Source-backed directory 61.6 Established public proof 25.9 32 checks / 0 mentions 28 sales · $11.7M 28 41 Website · Production · Reviews
Labib Hashim Individual Source-backed directory 60.7 Established public proof 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 19 sales · $10.9M 19 76 Website · Production · Reviews
Kito Smith Individual Source-backed directory 60.3 Established public proof 25.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 32 sales · $10.6M 32 34 Website · Production · Reviews
Harvest Real Estate Group Team Source-backed directory 59.9 Source-backed candidate 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 80 sales · $24.0M 80 51 Website · Production · Reviews
Jan Boyle Individual Source-backed directory 58.7 Source-backed candidate 38.7 32 checks / 1 mentions 19 sales · $10.4M 19 77 Website · Production · Reviews
Erika Chapa Individual Source-backed directory 57.2 Source-backed candidate 25.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 29 sales · $8.8M 29 40 Website · Production · Reviews
Danyelle Daniel Individual Source-backed directory 57.1 Source-backed candidate 26.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 19 sales · $7.7M 19 78 Website · Production · Reviews
Evan Rayborn Individual Source-backed directory 55.5 Source-backed candidate 26.7 32 checks / 0 mentions 18 sales · $6.7M 18 87 Website · Production · Reviews
Graves Group Team Source-backed directory 54.1 Source-backed candidate 26.0 32 checks / 0 mentions 58 sales · $30.9M 58 45 Website · Production · Reviews
JoHelen Clark Individual Source-backed directory 53.3 Source-backed candidate 25.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 30 sales · $11.5M 30 30 Website · Production · Reviews
Emerald Haus Group Team Source-backed directory 52.8 Source-backed candidate 27.1 32 checks / 0 mentions 33 sales · $19.4M 33 124 Website · Production · Reviews
Denise Ross Individual Source-backed directory 51.9 Source-backed candidate 26.6 32 checks / 0 mentions 16 sales · $7.3M 16 74 Website · Production · Reviews
The Boehm Team Team Source-backed directory 49.2 Source-backed candidate 26.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 40 sales · $24.7M 40 65 Website · Production · Reviews
The Hamilton Realty Group Team Source-backed directory 45.2 Source-backed candidate 26.8 32 checks / 0 mentions 36 sales · $13.0M 36 92 Website · Production · Reviews
Rise Property Group Team Source-backed directory 44.7 Production proof captured 25.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 47 sales · $25.1M 47 26 Website · Production · Reviews
Eric Mulero Individual Source-backed directory 44.6 Production proof captured 25.3 32 checks / 0 mentions 26 sales · $9.2M 26 27 Website · Production · Reviews
Jahda Longoria Individual Source-backed directory 37.3 Production proof captured 25.5 32 checks / 0 mentions 15 sales · $6.9M 15 30 Website · Production · Reviews
Sally Cresswell Individual Source-backed directory 29.8 Production proof captured 25.2 32 checks / 0 mentions 10 sales · $6.2M 10 25 Website · Production · Reviews