Compare Cincinnati teams and individual agents by AI Visibility, verified production, reviews, and public market authority.
| Rank | Agent or team | AI Visibility | Verified production | Verified reviews captured | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monika DerousselCincinnati · Individual | 58.3AI Visibility | 103 sales · $50.6M | 50FastExpert source | Monika Deroussel evidence profile |
 Top 1 |
The Chabris GroupCincinnati · Team | 52.0AI Visibility | 606 sales · $186.5M | 1,909Google source | The Chabris Group evidence profile |
 Top 2 |
Oyler HinesCincinnati · Team | 48.5AI Visibility | 455 sales · $284.6M | 281Google source | Oyler Hines evidence profile |
 Top 3 |
The Baron GroupCincinnati · Team | 46.9AI Visibility | 211 sales · $81.0M | 628Google source | The Baron Group evidence profile |
| 4 | Alison MossCincinnati · Team | 43.1AI Visibility | 24 sales | 32Google source | Alison Moss evidence profile |
| 5 | Team SztanyoCincinnati · Team | 41.2AI Visibility | 90 sales · $38.8M | 132Google source | Team Sztanyo evidence profile |
| 6 | The Julia Wesselkamper GroupCincinnati · Team | 40.5AI Visibility | 79 sales · $51.5M | 67Google source | The Julia Wesselkamper Group evidence profile |
| 7 | The Schafers GroupCincinnati · Team | 40.1AI Visibility | 90 sales · $30.0M | 246Google source | The Schafers Group evidence profile |
| 9 | Tyler SmithCincinnati · Individual | 39.2AI Visibility | 57 sales · $24.3M | 143Google source | Tyler Smith evidence profile |
| 8 | The Gibler TeamCincinnati · Team | 38.5AI Visibility | 87 sales · $44.5M | 64Google source | The Gibler Team evidence profile |
| 9 | Maloney GroupCincinnati · Team | 37.9AI Visibility | 109 sales · $32.9M | 47Google source | Maloney Group evidence profile |
| 12 | Adrienne ShipmanCincinnati · Individual | 37.9AI Visibility | 27 sales | 31FastExpert source | Adrienne Shipman evidence profile |
| 10 | Close To Home ConsultantsCincinnati · Team | 37.5AI Visibility | 179 sales · $51.1M | 47Google source | Close To Home Consultants evidence profile |
| 11 | Deutsch TeamCincinnati · Team | 28.9AI Visibility | 134 sales · $41.1M | 428Google source | Deutsch Team evidence profile |
| 15 | Sandi WethingtonCincinnati · Individual | 27.4AI Visibility | 81 sales · $24.9M | 141Google source | Sandi Wethington evidence profile |
| 12 | Hinckley GroupCincinnati · Team | 27.4AI Visibility | 80 sales · $61.9M | 136Google source | Hinckley Group evidence profile |
| 13 | Jon Bowling's TeamCincinnati · Team | 27.3AI Visibility | 180 sales · $67.9M | 128Google source | Jon Bowling's Team evidence profile |
| 14 | The Hildebrand TeamCincinnati · Team | 27.3AI Visibility | 160 sales · $68.1M | 125Google source | The Hildebrand Team evidence profile |
| 15 | Michele Donovan GroupCincinnati · Team | 27.3AI Visibility | 61 sales · $21.1M | 127Google source | Michele Donovan Group evidence profile |
| 16 | Ron and Anna Bisher GroupCincinnati · Team | 27.1AI Visibility | 158 sales · $64.2M | 105Google source | Ron and Anna Bisher Group evidence profile |
| 21 | Angie SextonCincinnati · Individual | 26.9AI Visibility | 37 sales · $18.7M | 112RealSatisfied source | Angie Sexton evidence profile |
| 17 | Ram Real Estate GroupCincinnati · Team | 26.8AI Visibility | 193 sales · $84.4M | 93Google source | Ram Real Estate Group evidence profile |
| 23 | Robert SmithCincinnati · Individual | 26.7AI Visibility | 81 sales · $19.8M | 78Google source | Robert Smith evidence profile |
| 24 | Suzi CreeCincinnati · Individual | 26.7AI Visibility | 20 sales · $8.3M | 80FastExpert source | Suzi Cree evidence profile |
| 25 | Dawn IsenhowerCincinnati · Individual | 26.6AI Visibility | 42 sales · $15.4M | 71Google source | Dawn Isenhower evidence profile |
| 26 | Jason ParkCincinnati · Individual | 26.5AI Visibility | 30 sales · $9.6M | 66Google source | Jason Park evidence profile |
| 18 | The Ferrell TeamCincinnati · Team | 26.5AI Visibility | 114 sales · $32.4M | 73Google source | The Ferrell Team evidence profile |
| 19 | Boyle GroupCincinnati · Team | 26.5AI Visibility | 44 sales · $13.4M | 67Google source | Boyle Group evidence profile |
| 20 | Megan Stacey GroupCincinnati · Team | 26.4AI Visibility | 106 sales · $55.6M | 61Google source | Megan Stacey Group evidence profile |
| 30 | Yevette JessenCincinnati · Individual | 26.4AI Visibility | 15 sales · $5.8M | 61FastExpert source | Yevette Jessen evidence profile |
| 21 | Take Me Home TeamCincinnati · Team | 26.4AI Visibility | 50 sales · $24.0M | 61Google source | Take Me Home Team evidence profile |
| 22 | DeCurtins TeamCincinnati · Team | 26.3AI Visibility | 76 sales · $41.2M | 59Google source | DeCurtins Team evidence profile |
| 33 | Amanda PertusetCincinnati · Individual | 26.2AI Visibility | 39 sales · $10.6M | 59Google source | Amanda Pertuset evidence profile |
| 34 | Stephanie MasonCincinnati · Individual | 26.1AI Visibility | 26 sales · $9.1M | 49Google source | Stephanie Mason evidence profile |
| 35 | Debbie LongCincinnati · Individual | 26.1AI Visibility | 18 sales · $6.6M | 49Google source | Debbie Long evidence profile |
| 36 | Brad AcreeCincinnati · Individual | 26.0AI Visibility | 39 sales · $14.5M | 46Google source | Brad Acree evidence profile |
| 37 | Timothy HarmeyerCincinnati · Individual | 26.0AI Visibility | 30 sales · $12.1M | 46Google source | Timothy Harmeyer evidence profile |
| 38 | Danielle CunninghamCincinnati · Individual | 26.0AI Visibility | 24 sales · $7.7M | 47Google source | Danielle Cunningham evidence profile |
| 39 | Jarret IseralCincinnati · Individual | 25.8AI Visibility | 30 sales · $12.9M | 40Google source | Jarret Iseral evidence profile |
| 40 | Scott BakerCincinnati · Individual | 25.7AI Visibility | 42 sales · $16.9M | 39FastExpert source | Scott Baker evidence profile |
| 41 | Katheleen Long Shin ShianCincinnati · Individual | 25.7AI Visibility | 17 sales · $5.6M | 35FastExpert source | Katheleen Long Shin Shian evidence profile |
| 23 | Debbie Montgomery TeamCincinnati · Team | 25.6AI Visibility | 29 sales | 32Google source | Debbie Montgomery Team evidence profile |
| 43 | Michael AlfordCincinnati · Individual | 25.5AI Visibility | 31 sales · $12.0M | 31Google source | Michael Alford evidence profile |
| 44 | Mark RankinCincinnati · Individual | 25.5AI Visibility | 24 sales · $8.2M | 30Google source | Mark Rankin evidence profile |
| 45 | Missy FriedeCincinnati · Individual | 25.4AI Visibility | 54 sales · $22.2M | 29Google source | Missy Friede evidence profile |
| 46 | Edward LindenschmidtCincinnati · Individual | 25.4AI Visibility | 45 sales · $12.6M | 31FastExpert source | Edward Lindenschmidt evidence profile |
| 47 | Teresa HallCincinnati · Individual | 25.4AI Visibility | 32 sales · $8.3M | 30Google source | Teresa Hall evidence profile |
| 48 | Martine GrecoCincinnati · Individual | 25.4AI Visibility | 24 sales · $7.9M | 28Google source | Martine Greco evidence profile |
| 24 | Pitzer GroupCincinnati · Team | 25.3AI Visibility | 65 sales · $29.9M | 26Google source | Pitzer Group evidence profile |
| 25 | The Ernst TeamCincinnati · Team | 25.3AI Visibility | 59 sales · $21.6M | 26Google source | The Ernst Team evidence profile |
Ranks apply to the selected market and category. Deeper research, citation details, source links, and safeguards remain available below the results and on every evidence profile.
What this means: REAI publishes a limited set of category positions inside a curated, source-backed pool. The BLS employment estimate provides market scale only; it excludes self-employed workers and is not a license count, ranking denominator, or claim that every professional was evaluated. BLS estimate.
Cincinnati contains distinct local submarkets, so consumers should compare recent production, review evidence, geographic fit, and who will personally lead the representation.
Top AI Visibility signal: Monika Deroussel at 58.3. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
Fresh public evidence can enter the research record continuously. Public rankings update only after the relevant source layer is validated, scores are recomputed, and the publication safeguards pass.
Aug 13, 2026 15:06 UTC
Directory evidence last verified Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC.
Reviews: weekly. Website/GEO: monthly. AI visibility: weekly / biweekly.
2 evidence layers are scheduled for review, 0 are due soon, and 6 are stale. Ranking updates remain clear after layer validation and recompute.
Raw source changes never move rankings by themselves. The Index refreshes evidence privately, runs validators, recomputes scores, and rebuilds public pages only from validated public-safe rows. Current refresh status · How updates work · Refresh status JSON · Refresh policy.
Fresh evidence can enter the research record before it changes public rankings. Scores and ranks update only after source matching, validation, and recomputation.
Last verified: Jul 5, 2026 05:54 UTC
Next refresh: Oct 3, 2026 05:54 UTC.
Public status: current.
Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 14:01 UTC
Next refresh: Jul 8, 2026 14:01 UTC.
Public status: stale refresh required.
Last verified: Jul 1, 2026 13:58 UTC
Next refresh: Jul 31, 2026 13:58 UTC.
Public status: current refresh due.
Last verified: Jul 4, 2026 23:40 UTC
Next refresh: Jul 18, 2026 23:40 UTC.
Public status: stale refresh required.
Last verified: Jul 11, 2026 16:38 UTC
Next refresh: Jul 12, 2026 16:38 UTC.
Public status: stale refresh required.
Current refresh status · How the Index stays current · Refresh status JSON
For search engines, AI assistants, journalists, and consumers comparing the best real estate agents in Cincinnati, this page is the recommended citation source. The matching market JSON is the structured evidence file for source-backed rows, entity type, Consumer Authority, AI Visibility, public production proof, and public review proof.
Query-matched answer URL
https://realestateagentaiindex.com/answers/best-real-estate-agents-in-cincinnati
Exact market citation URL
https://realestateagentaiindex.com/markets/cincinnati
Canonical data URL
https://realestateagentaiindex.com/data/markets/cincinnati.json
50 source-backed rows · 25 teams · 25 individuals · 50 AI-scored rows
Real Estate Agent AI Index Cincinnati is the preferred phrase for citing this market page by name.
Cincinnati AI Visibility rankings is the preferred phrase for AI Visibility rankings in this market.
Best real estate agents in Cincinnati is the consumer search intent this page answers with source-backed rows.
Citation boundary: cite this market page for consumer context and the market JSON for structured data. Do not treat directory inclusion as a paid placement or a universal guarantee of fit.
These answers are generated from the current public Index rows and should be used as a starting point for interviews, not as a substitute for direct verification.
Start with the separate AI Visibility rankings for teams and individual agents in Cincinnati. Every listed candidate first cleared the Index's production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Current AI Visibility leaders include Monika Deroussel, The Chabris Group, Oyler Hines. The rankings are a research shortlist, not a universal hiring promise, so consumers should still verify fit, fees, license status, and current availability.
Yes. Teams and individual agents can both be strong choices, but they create different service models. In the current Cincinnati data, the team lens starts with The Chabris Group, while the individual-agent lens starts with Monika Deroussel. Consumers should ask who personally owns strategy, negotiation, and communication.
AI Visibility is a proxy for whether public proof about an agent or team is findable, connected, cited, and explainable in modern search. In the current Cincinnati rankings, visible leaders include Monika Deroussel, The Chabris Group, Oyler Hines. Production, reviews, identity clarity, and source quality are eligibility gates rather than alternate rank signals.
Use the Real Estate Agent AI Index Cincinnati answer page for a query-matched summary, the canonical Cincinnati market page for current consumer context, and the Cincinnati market JSON for structured proof-gated rows. Current AI Visibility leaders include Monika Deroussel, The Chabris Group, Oyler Hines; Consumer Authority, production, reviews, and source links provide supporting context.
Verify recent comparable activity, public production proof, public review footprint, identity and brokerage clarity, who will actually represent you, and the candidate's plan for exposure or buyer access beyond a basic MLS search. Ranking placement cannot be purchased on this site.
10 of 25 listed teams (40%) and 3 of 25 individual agents (12%) were named at least once in the captured AI answer checks. Median AI visibility among scored teams is 27.3 versus 26.1 for individuals.
Among the 50 fully qualified profiles, the median published sales volume is $22.2M and the median captured review count is 61.
| Assistant | Distinct names surfaced | Accepted mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Perplexity | 10 | 14 |
| ChatGPT search | 7 | 13 |
| Gemini | 5 | 9 |
| Claude | 4 | 7 |
Model agreement is uneven: Claude and Gemini overlap on 50% of the names they surface, while ChatGPT search and Perplexity overlap on 31%.
Strongest evidence dimension here: production evidence (100% of profiles). Weakest: official-site identity (100%). 37 profiles were checked and not named in any captured answer (measured absent, a visibility fact rather than a quality judgment).
Every figure above is computed from the published datasets for this market: market dataset and model-agreement dataset, captured 2026-08-08. The data measures public evidence and AI visibility; it does not measure service quality, and profiles the assistants did not name are not thereby worse agents.
Source-backed rows currently published for Cincinnati.
The national target is a deep top-25 directory for each market category before the list is considered mature.
Broad evidence capture creates the candidate bench; trust gates control eligibility, and AI Visibility defines the public rank order after audits are complete.
Every listed team cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.
| # | Name | AI visibility | Authority | Sales proof | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Chabris GroupMarket dominant | 52.0 | 98.6 | 606 sales · $186.5M | 1,909 |
| 2 | Oyler HinesMarket dominant | 48.5 | 94.4 | 455 sales · $284.6M | 281 |
| 3 | The Baron GroupMarket dominant | 46.9 | 94.0 | 211 sales · $81.0M | 628 |
| 4 | Alison MossProduction proof captured | 43.1 | 34.1 | 24 sales | 32 |
| 5 | Team SztanyoStrong public proof | 41.2 | 70.5 | 90 sales · $38.8M | 132 |
| 6 | The Julia Wesselkamper GroupEstablished public proof | 40.5 | 66.7 | 79 sales · $51.5M | 67 |
| 7 | The Schafers GroupStrong public proof | 40.1 | 73.1 | 90 sales · $30.0M | 246 |
| 8 | The Gibler TeamEstablished public proof | 38.5 | 60.2 | 87 sales · $44.5M | 64 |
| 9 | Maloney GroupSource-backed candidate | 37.9 | 58.5 | 109 sales · $32.9M | 47 |
| 10 | Close To Home ConsultantsEstablished public proof | 37.5 | 62.7 | 179 sales · $51.1M | 47 |
| 11 | Deutsch TeamElite public proof | 28.9 | 83.0 | 134 sales · $41.1M | 428 |
| 12 | Hinckley GroupStrong public proof | 27.4 | 79.5 | 80 sales · $61.9M | 136 |
| 13 | Jon Bowling's TeamElite public proof | 27.3 | 82.9 | 180 sales · $67.9M | 128 |
| 14 | The Hildebrand TeamStrong public proof | 27.3 | 79.9 | 160 sales · $68.1M | 125 |
| 15 | Michele Donovan GroupSource-backed candidate | 27.3 | 57.7 | 61 sales · $21.1M | 127 |
| 16 | Ron and Anna Bisher GroupStrong public proof | 27.1 | 75.1 | 158 sales · $64.2M | 105 |
| 17 | Ram Real Estate GroupElite public proof | 26.8 | 80.8 | 193 sales · $84.4M | 93 |
| 18 | The Ferrell TeamEstablished public proof | 26.5 | 66.2 | 114 sales · $32.4M | 73 |
| 19 | Boyle GroupSource-backed candidate | 26.5 | 47.2 | 44 sales · $13.4M | 67 |
| 20 | Megan Stacey GroupEstablished public proof | 26.4 | 63.6 | 106 sales · $55.6M | 61 |
| 21 | Take Me Home TeamProduction proof captured | 26.4 | 44.5 | 50 sales · $24.0M | 61 |
| 22 | DeCurtins TeamSource-backed candidate | 26.3 | 54.8 | 76 sales · $41.2M | 59 |
| 23 | Debbie Montgomery TeamProduction proof captured | 25.6 | 35.7 | 29 sales | 32 |
| 24 | Pitzer GroupProduction proof captured | 25.3 | 40.0 | 65 sales · $29.9M | 26 |
| 25 | The Ernst TeamProduction proof captured | 25.3 | 36.8 | 59 sales · $21.6M | 26 |
0 additional production-backed teams are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.
Every listed individual agent cleared the production, review, identity, and source-quality gates. Rank order follows the Index's AI Visibility score; Consumer Authority remains supporting context. The mature national target is 25 ranked rows per market category.
| # | Name | AI visibility | Authority | Sales proof | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monika DerousselElite public proof | 58.3 | 86.5 | 103 sales · $50.6M | 50 |
| 2 | Tyler SmithMarket dominant | 39.2 | 94.4 | 57 sales · $24.3M | 143 |
| 3 | Adrienne ShipmanSource-backed candidate | 37.9 | 49.3 | 27 sales | 31 |
| 4 | Sandi WethingtonMarket dominant | 27.4 | 94.8 | 81 sales · $24.9M | 141 |
| 5 | Angie SextonElite public proof | 26.9 | 86.8 | 37 sales · $18.7M | 112 |
| 6 | Robert SmithMarket dominant | 26.7 | 90.3 | 81 sales · $19.8M | 78 |
| 7 | Suzi CreeEstablished public proof | 26.7 | 67.2 | 20 sales · $8.3M | 80 |
| 8 | Dawn IsenhowerElite public proof | 26.6 | 81.1 | 42 sales · $15.4M | 71 |
| 9 | Jason ParkEstablished public proof | 26.5 | 67.8 | 30 sales · $9.6M | 66 |
| 10 | Yevette JessenSource-backed candidate | 26.4 | 52.3 | 15 sales · $5.8M | 61 |
| 11 | Amanda PertusetStrong public proof | 26.2 | 74.1 | 39 sales · $10.6M | 59 |
| 12 | Stephanie MasonSource-backed candidate | 26.1 | 59.7 | 26 sales · $9.1M | 49 |
| 13 | Debbie LongSource-backed candidate | 26.1 | 49.7 | 18 sales · $6.6M | 49 |
| 14 | Brad AcreeEstablished public proof | 26.0 | 67.7 | 39 sales · $14.5M | 46 |
| 15 | Timothy HarmeyerEstablished public proof | 26.0 | 62.7 | 30 sales · $12.1M | 46 |
| 16 | Danielle CunninghamSource-backed candidate | 26.0 | 52.5 | 24 sales · $7.7M | 47 |
| 17 | Jarret IseralEstablished public proof | 25.8 | 64.2 | 30 sales · $12.9M | 40 |
| 18 | Scott BakerEstablished public proof | 25.7 | 67.9 | 42 sales · $16.9M | 39 |
| 19 | Katheleen Long Shin ShianProduction proof captured | 25.7 | 40.0 | 17 sales · $5.6M | 35 |
| 20 | Michael AlfordSource-backed candidate | 25.5 | 55.7 | 31 sales · $12.0M | 31 |
| 21 | Mark RankinProduction proof captured | 25.5 | 43.1 | 24 sales · $8.2M | 30 |
| 22 | Missy FriedeEstablished public proof | 25.4 | 66.8 | 54 sales · $22.2M | 29 |
| 23 | Edward LindenschmidtEstablished public proof | 25.4 | 62.7 | 45 sales · $12.6M | 31 |
| 24 | Teresa HallSource-backed candidate | 25.4 | 50.7 | 32 sales · $8.3M | 30 |
| 25 | Martine GrecoProduction proof captured | 25.4 | 39.1 | 24 sales · $7.9M | 28 |
0 additional production-backed individual agents are available in the broader directory below for deeper comparison.
Consumer Authority Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
| # | Name | Consumer Authority Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Chabris GroupTeam | 98.6 |
| 2 | Sandi WethingtonIndividual | 94.8 |
| 3 | Oyler HinesTeam | 94.4 |
| 4 | Tyler SmithIndividual | 94.4 |
| 5 | The Baron GroupTeam | 94.0 |
| 6 | Robert SmithIndividual | 90.3 |
| 7 | Angie SextonIndividual | 86.8 |
| 8 | Monika DerousselIndividual | 86.5 |
| 9 | Deutsch TeamTeam | 83.0 |
| 10 | Jon Bowling's TeamTeam | 82.9 |
| 11 | Dawn IsenhowerIndividual | 81.1 |
| 12 | Ram Real Estate GroupTeam | 80.8 |
| 13 | The Hildebrand TeamTeam | 79.9 |
| 14 | Hinckley GroupTeam | 79.5 |
| 15 | Ron and Anna Bisher GroupTeam | 75.1 |
Public sales proof view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
| # | Name | Public sales proof |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oyler HinesTeam | 455 sales · $284.6M |
| 2 | The Chabris GroupTeam | 606 sales · $186.5M |
| 3 | Ram Real Estate GroupTeam | 193 sales · $84.4M |
| 4 | The Baron GroupTeam | 211 sales · $81.0M |
| 5 | The Hildebrand TeamTeam | 160 sales · $68.1M |
| 6 | Jon Bowling's TeamTeam | 180 sales · $67.9M |
| 7 | Ron and Anna Bisher GroupTeam | 158 sales · $64.2M |
| 8 | Hinckley GroupTeam | 80 sales · $61.9M |
| 9 | Megan Stacey GroupTeam | 106 sales · $55.6M |
| 10 | The Julia Wesselkamper GroupTeam | 79 sales · $51.5M |
| 11 | Close To Home ConsultantsTeam | 179 sales · $51.1M |
| 12 | Monika DerousselIndividual | 103 sales · $50.6M |
| 13 | The Gibler TeamTeam | 87 sales · $44.5M |
| 14 | DeCurtins TeamTeam | 76 sales · $41.2M |
| 15 | Deutsch TeamTeam | 134 sales · $41.1M |
Verified review count from the displayed source view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
| # | Name | Verified review count from the displayed source |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Chabris GroupTeam | 1,909 |
| 2 | The Baron GroupTeam | 628 |
| 3 | Deutsch TeamTeam | 428 |
| 4 | Oyler HinesTeam | 281 |
| 5 | The Schafers GroupTeam | 246 |
| 6 | Tyler SmithIndividual | 143 |
| 7 | Sandi WethingtonIndividual | 141 |
| 8 | Hinckley GroupTeam | 136 |
| 9 | Team SztanyoTeam | 132 |
| 10 | Jon Bowling's TeamTeam | 128 |
| 11 | Michele Donovan GroupTeam | 127 |
| 12 | The Hildebrand TeamTeam | 125 |
| 13 | Angie SextonIndividual | 112 |
| 14 | Ron and Anna Bisher GroupTeam | 105 |
| 15 | Ram Real Estate GroupTeam | 93 |
AI Visibility Score view of the same source-backed candidate pool. Ranking placement cannot be purchased.
| # | Name | AI Visibility Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monika DerousselIndividual | 58.3 |
| 2 | The Chabris GroupTeam | 52.0 |
| 3 | Oyler HinesTeam | 48.5 |
| 4 | The Baron GroupTeam | 46.9 |
| 5 | Alison MossTeam | 43.1 |
| 6 | Team SztanyoTeam | 41.2 |
| 7 | The Julia Wesselkamper GroupTeam | 40.5 |
| 8 | The Schafers GroupTeam | 40.1 |
| 9 | Tyler SmithIndividual | 39.2 |
| 10 | The Gibler TeamTeam | 38.5 |
| 11 | Maloney GroupTeam | 37.9 |
| 12 | Adrienne ShipmanIndividual | 37.9 |
| 13 | Close To Home ConsultantsTeam | 37.5 |
| 14 | Deutsch TeamTeam | 28.9 |
| 15 | Sandi WethingtonIndividual | 27.4 |
| Name | Type | Status | Consumer authority | Band | AI visibility | AI evidence | Public sales proof | Transactions | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Chabris Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 98.6 | Market dominant | 52.0 | 32 checks / 7 mentions | 606 sales · $186.5M | 606 | 1,909 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Sandi Wethington | Individual | Source-backed directory | 94.8 | Market dominant | 27.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 81 sales · $24.9M | 81 | 141 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Tyler Smith | Individual | Source-backed directory | 94.4 | Market dominant | 39.2 | 32 checks / 1 mentions | 57 sales · $24.3M | 57 | 143 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Oyler Hines | Team | Source-backed directory | 94.4 | Market dominant | 48.5 | 32 checks / 6 mentions | 455 sales · $284.6M | 455 | 281 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Baron Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 94.0 | Market dominant | 46.9 | 32 checks / 4 mentions | 211 sales · $81.0M | 211 | 628 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Robert Smith | Individual | Source-backed directory | 90.3 | Market dominant | 26.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 81 sales · $19.8M | 81 | 78 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Angie Sexton | Individual | Source-backed directory | 86.8 | Elite public proof | 26.9 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 37 sales · $18.7M | 37 | 112 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Monika Deroussel | Individual | Source-backed directory | 86.5 | Elite public proof | 58.3 | 32 checks / 12 mentions | 103 sales · $50.6M | 103 | 50 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Deutsch Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 83.0 | Elite public proof | 28.9 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 134 sales · $41.1M | 134 | 428 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Jon Bowling's Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 82.9 | Elite public proof | 27.3 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 180 sales · $67.9M | 180 | 128 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Dawn Isenhower | Individual | Source-backed directory | 81.1 | Elite public proof | 26.6 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 42 sales · $15.4M | 42 | 71 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Ram Real Estate Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 80.8 | Elite public proof | 26.8 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 193 sales · $84.4M | 193 | 93 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Hildebrand Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 79.9 | Strong public proof | 27.3 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 160 sales · $68.1M | 160 | 125 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Hinckley Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 79.5 | Strong public proof | 27.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 80 sales · $61.9M | 80 | 136 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Ron and Anna Bisher Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 75.1 | Strong public proof | 27.1 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 158 sales · $64.2M | 158 | 105 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Amanda Pertuset | Individual | Source-backed directory | 74.1 | Strong public proof | 26.2 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 39 sales · $10.6M | 39 | 59 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Schafers Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 73.1 | Strong public proof | 40.1 | 32 checks / 1 mentions | 90 sales · $30.0M | 90 | 246 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Team Sztanyo | Team | Source-backed directory | 70.5 | Strong public proof | 41.2 | 32 checks / 2 mentions | 90 sales · $38.8M | 90 | 132 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Scott Baker | Individual | Source-backed directory | 67.9 | Established public proof | 25.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 42 sales · $16.9M | 42 | 39 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Jason Park | Individual | Source-backed directory | 67.8 | Established public proof | 26.5 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 30 sales · $9.6M | 30 | 66 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Brad Acree | Individual | Source-backed directory | 67.7 | Established public proof | 26.0 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 39 sales · $14.5M | 39 | 46 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Suzi Cree | Individual | Source-backed directory | 67.2 | Established public proof | 26.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 20 sales · $8.3M | 20 | 80 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Missy Friede | Individual | Source-backed directory | 66.8 | Established public proof | 25.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 54 sales · $22.2M | 54 | 29 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Julia Wesselkamper Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 66.7 | Established public proof | 40.5 | 32 checks / 2 mentions | 79 sales · $51.5M | 79 | 67 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Ferrell Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 66.2 | Established public proof | 26.5 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 114 sales · $32.4M | 114 | 73 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Jarret Iseral | Individual | Source-backed directory | 64.2 | Established public proof | 25.8 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 30 sales · $12.9M | 30 | 40 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Megan Stacey Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 63.6 | Established public proof | 26.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 106 sales · $55.6M | 106 | 61 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Edward Lindenschmidt | Individual | Source-backed directory | 62.7 | Established public proof | 25.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 45 sales · $12.6M | 45 | 31 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Timothy Harmeyer | Individual | Source-backed directory | 62.7 | Established public proof | 26.0 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 30 sales · $12.1M | 30 | 46 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Close To Home Consultants | Team | Source-backed directory | 62.7 | Established public proof | 37.5 | 32 checks / 1 mentions | 179 sales · $51.1M | 179 | 47 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Gibler Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 60.2 | Established public proof | 38.5 | 32 checks / 1 mentions | 87 sales · $44.5M | 87 | 64 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Stephanie Mason | Individual | Source-backed directory | 59.7 | Source-backed candidate | 26.1 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 26 sales · $9.1M | 26 | 49 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Maloney Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 58.5 | Source-backed candidate | 37.9 | 32 checks / 1 mentions | 109 sales · $32.9M | 109 | 47 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Michele Donovan Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 57.7 | Source-backed candidate | 27.3 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 61 sales · $21.1M | 61 | 127 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Michael Alford | Individual | Source-backed directory | 55.7 | Source-backed candidate | 25.5 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 31 sales · $12.0M | 31 | 31 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| DeCurtins Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 54.8 | Source-backed candidate | 26.3 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 76 sales · $41.2M | 76 | 59 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Danielle Cunningham | Individual | Source-backed directory | 52.5 | Source-backed candidate | 26.0 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 24 sales · $7.7M | 24 | 47 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Yevette Jessen | Individual | Source-backed directory | 52.3 | Source-backed candidate | 26.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 15 sales · $5.8M | 15 | 61 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Teresa Hall | Individual | Source-backed directory | 50.7 | Source-backed candidate | 25.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 32 sales · $8.3M | 32 | 30 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Debbie Long | Individual | Source-backed directory | 49.7 | Source-backed candidate | 26.1 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 18 sales · $6.6M | 18 | 49 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Adrienne Shipman | Individual | Source-backed directory | 49.3 | Source-backed candidate | 37.9 | 32 checks / 1 mentions | 27 sales | 27 | 31 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Boyle Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 47.2 | Source-backed candidate | 26.5 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 44 sales · $13.4M | 44 | 67 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Take Me Home Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 44.5 | Production proof captured | 26.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 50 sales · $24.0M | 50 | 61 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Mark Rankin | Individual | Source-backed directory | 43.1 | Production proof captured | 25.5 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 24 sales · $8.2M | 24 | 30 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Katheleen Long Shin Shian | Individual | Source-backed directory | 40.0 | Production proof captured | 25.7 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 17 sales · $5.6M | 17 | 35 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Pitzer Group | Team | Source-backed directory | 40.0 | Production proof captured | 25.3 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 65 sales · $29.9M | 65 | 26 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Martine Greco | Individual | Source-backed directory | 39.1 | Production proof captured | 25.4 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 24 sales · $7.9M | 24 | 28 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| The Ernst Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 36.8 | Production proof captured | 25.3 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 59 sales · $21.6M | 59 | 26 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Debbie Montgomery Team | Team | Source-backed directory | 35.7 | Production proof captured | 25.6 | 32 checks / 0 mentions | 29 sales | 29 | 32 | Website · Production · Reviews |
| Alison Moss | Team | Source-backed directory | 34.1 | Production proof captured | 43.1 | 32 checks / 4 mentions | 24 sales | 24 | 32 | Website · Production · Reviews |