East Coast
New York Metro
Manhattan-first luxury and high-production public footprint, with select broader New York luxury corridor candidates flagged when appropriate.
118 source-backed directory rows
Refresh Policy
How the Real Estate Agent AI Index Stays Current
The Index is designed as a living research publication: public evidence can be refreshed as it changes, but public rankings move only after validation gates pass.
Fresh evidence enters before rankings move
Sales-volume eligibility, review-count proof, website authority, AI visibility tests, and market coverage each follow a defined review schedule. New source information is checked continuously, but it does not change a public rank until it has been verified.
Why rankings do not change from raw updates
A raw source change can be ambiguous, stale, duplicated, sponsored, or tied to the wrong agent identity. The Index waits for source matching, identity checks, source-rights review, score recomputation, and public package validation before a ranking changes.
What consumers should look for
Use the freshness panel, market pages, and profile proof notes to understand whether evidence is current enough for your decision. A recently refreshed score should still be paired with an interview, license check, fee review, and property-specific strategy discussion.
Current Market Coverage
Start with the live market page and its AI Visibility rankings.
Market pages separate proof-gated teams and individual agents, rank each category by AI Visibility, and preserve production proof, review footprint, Consumer Authority, and source links for comparison.
West Coast
Los Angeles
Los Angeles County and westside luxury markets where AI visibility, media authority, and high-value representation intersect.
88 source-backed directory rows
Midwest
Chicago
Chicago city and close-in luxury/high-production residential markets.
125 source-backed directory rows
Texas
Dallas-Fort Worth
Dallas, Fort Worth, and high-production North Texas residential markets where public production proof, review footprint, and AI visibility help consumers compare teams and individual agents.
61 source-backed directory rows
Florida
Orlando
Orlando and the surrounding Central Florida residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Georgia
Atlanta
Atlanta and the surrounding metro residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
California
San Francisco Bay Area
San Francisco, Oakland, Marin, the Peninsula, and nearby Bay Area residential markets, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Philadelphia and the surrounding Main Line, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery County residential markets, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
District of Columbia, Virginia, and Maryland
Washington DC / Northern Virginia
Washington, DC, Northern Virginia, and the close-in Maryland suburbs, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
51 source-backed directory rows
Washington
Seattle
Seattle, Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, and the surrounding Puget Sound residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Minnesota
Minneapolis-St. Paul
Minneapolis, Saint Paul, and the surrounding Twin Cities residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Colorado
Denver
Denver and the surrounding Front Range residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Massachusetts
Boston
Boston and the surrounding Greater Boston residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Tennessee
Nashville
Nashville, Franklin, Brentwood, Spring Hill, Murfreesboro, and the surrounding Middle Tennessee residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
California
San Diego
San Diego and the surrounding coastal, central, North County, and inland residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Florida
Miami / South Florida
Miami, Miami Beach, Boca Raton, Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Jupiter, Coral Springs, and the broader South Florida residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence. Category lists include only candidates that cleared the current trust gates.
50 source-backed directory rows
Nevada
Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Henderson, Summerlin, and the surrounding Southern Nevada residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Missouri and Illinois
St. Louis
St. Louis City, St. Louis County, St. Charles County, and the surrounding metro residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Texas
Houston
Houston and the surrounding Greater Houston residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in exact-entity public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
54 source-backed directory rows
Missouri and Kansas
Kansas City
Kansas City and the surrounding Missouri and Kansas residential market, with separate individual-agent and team comparisons grounded in exact-entity public production, review, and AI-visibility evidence.
50 source-backed directory rows
Arizona
Phoenix
Phoenix, Scottsdale, Paradise Valley, and the surrounding Valley of the Sun residential market. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
Texas
Austin
Austin and the surrounding Central Texas communities in the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown market. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
California
Inland Empire / Riverside
Riverside and San Bernardino counties, kept separate from Los Angeles, San Diego, and coastal Orange County evidence. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
Maryland
Baltimore
Baltimore and the surrounding Central Maryland residential market, kept separate from Washington DC evidence. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
Ohio and Kentucky
Cincinnati
Greater Cincinnati and the close-in Northern Kentucky tri-state residential market. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
Ohio
Columbus
Columbus and the surrounding Central Ohio residential market, including Dublin, New Albany, and Westerville. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
Indiana
Indianapolis
Indianapolis and the surrounding Hamilton, Hendricks, Johnson, and Boone County residential communities. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
Florida
Jacksonville
Jacksonville, the Beaches, Ponte Vedra, St. Augustine, and the surrounding Northeast Florida residential market. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
Oregon and Washington
Portland
Portland and the surrounding Oregon communities plus the close-in Vancouver-Camas Washington corridor. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
North Carolina
Raleigh
Raleigh, Cary, Durham, Chapel Hill, and the surrounding Research Triangle residential market. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
California
Sacramento
Sacramento and the surrounding Roseville, Folsom, Elk Grove, and foothill residential communities, separate from Bay Area evidence. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
North Carolina and South Carolina
Charlotte
Charlotte, Matthews, Huntersville, Cornelius, Davidson, Mint Hill, Waxhaw, Fort Mill, and Tega Cay. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
50 source-backed directory rows
Texas
San Antonio
San Antonio, New Braunfels, Boerne, Schertz, Cibolo, Bulverde, Helotes, and Alamo Heights. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
37 source-backed directory rows
Florida
Tampa Bay
Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Palm Harbor, Brandon, Riverview, Wesley Chapel, Lutz, Safety Harbor, and Dunedin. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
44 source-backed directory rows
Michigan
Detroit
Detroit, Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Troy, Royal Oak, Rochester Hills, Grosse Pointe, Novi, Farmington Hills, and Livonia. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
30 source-backed directory rows
Michigan
Grand Rapids
Grand Rapids and the surrounding West Michigan residential market, including nearby Kent County communities represented by the exact entity-scoped evidence in this cohort. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
21 source-backed directory rows
Kentucky and Indiana
Louisville
Louisville/Jefferson County and the close-in Kentucky-Indiana residential market, limited to the exact entity-scoped evidence in this cohort. Separate individual and team comparisons use the same production, review, identity, and AI-measurement framework as every published REAI market.
30 source-backed directory rows
Use This In Practice
Turn the research into better interview questions.
Before hiring representation, compare the score, verified public proof, source list, and local fit. Then ask each candidate to connect their claims to recent local proof.